2021
DOI: 10.26434/chemrxiv.14593476
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Framework for Quantifying Uncertainty in DFT Energy Corrections

Abstract: In this work, we demonstrate a method to quantify uncertainty in corrections to density functional theory (DFT) energies based on empirical results. Such corrections are commonly used to improve the accuracy of computational enthalpies of formation, phase stability predictions, and other energy-derived properties, for example. We incorporate this method into a new DFT energy correction scheme comprising a mixture of oxidation-state and composition-dependent corrections and show that many chemical systems conta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The highlighted V-shaped region shows the area in which the average absolute error is greater than the energy to the known convex hull; this is the region where the model is most at risk of misclassifying structures. In most of this region, Wren’s accuracy is well below the threshold of 100 meV per atom considered to be the accuracy of semilocal DFT across diverse chemistries ( 66 ) and comparable to the threshold of ∼ 50 meV per atom characteristic of fitted correction schemes ( 67 69 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The highlighted V-shaped region shows the area in which the average absolute error is greater than the energy to the known convex hull; this is the region where the model is most at risk of misclassifying structures. In most of this region, Wren’s accuracy is well below the threshold of 100 meV per atom considered to be the accuracy of semilocal DFT across diverse chemistries ( 66 ) and comparable to the threshold of ∼ 50 meV per atom characteristic of fitted correction schemes ( 67 69 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The highlighted region shows the area in which the average absolute error is greater than the energy to the known convex hull -this is the region where the model is most at risk of miss-classifying structures. However, we see that in the majority of this region the model's accuracy is well below the 100 meV per atom threshold considered to be the accuracy of semi-local DFT across diverse chemistries [28] and comparable to the ∼ 50 meV per atom threshold characteristic of fitted correction schemes [29][30][31]. This high level of accuracy around the stability threshold leads to the model's impressive performance when identifying materials below the known convex hull.…”
Section: Selecting Stable Materials From Diverse Chemical Spacesmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…60 demonstrates that care has to be taken when using PBE for OER or similar reactions. While DFT correction schemes have been suggested to reduce these inaccuracies, 61 we shall still use PBE below, also for Gibbs free energies, because the method is fast and reliable enough to quantify trends in comparable situations, e.g. for screening of different materials or checking cluster vs. periodic models.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%