2001
DOI: 10.1109/42.938251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework for predictive modeling of anatomical deformations

Abstract: A framework for modeling and predicting anatomical deformations is presented, and tested on simulated images. Although a variety of deformations can be modeled in this framework, emphasis is placed on surgical planning, and particularly on modeling and predicting changes of anatomy between preoperative and intraoperative positions, as well as on deformations induced by tumor growth. Two methods are examined. The first is purely shape-based and utilizes the principal modes of co-variation between anatomy and de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But a practical difficulty of these models is the extensive time necessary to mesh the brain and solve the problem, which is takes too much time for intra-operative purposes. Davatzikos et al (2001) proposed a statistical framework consisting of pre-computing the main mode of deformation of the brain using a biomechanical model. And recent extensions of this framework show promising results for intra-operative surgical guidance based on manually extracted data (Lunn et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But a practical difficulty of these models is the extensive time necessary to mesh the brain and solve the problem, which is takes too much time for intra-operative purposes. Davatzikos et al (2001) proposed a statistical framework consisting of pre-computing the main mode of deformation of the brain using a biomechanical model. And recent extensions of this framework show promising results for intra-operative surgical guidance based on manually extracted data (Lunn et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimation error can therefore be decomposed into 2 orthogonal components [12] e j =ě j +ẽ j (8) The reconstruction errorě j , is due to the inability of representing the deformed shape q j as the sum of the mean and a linear combination of the principal modes of deformation, while the errorẽ j is due to inability of estimating the deformed shape perfectly from the 2D information provided by the TRUS images, and due the approximation of equation (3). The maximum estimation error and reconstruction error for each of the simulations are shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The framework of [3] can be used to extend the approach presented here to a deformable model for the prostate that includes the modes of deformation as well as modes of shape. Such model can be constructed from several subjects instead of using a patient specific biomechanical model.…”
Section: Summary and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, a standard non-rigid registration method cannot be directly applied, and the topic has not been investigated much in depth in literature. Due to large deformations, standard registration methods like FEM and dense diffeomorphic registration, fail to achieve accurate structure alignment Recent research has focused on insufflation modeling using only pre-operative images and registration of pre-operative images to laparoscopic images [3,4]. However, none of the proposed methods have made use of the intra-operative images in their framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%