International Congress on Ultra Modern Telecommunications and Control Systems 2010
DOI: 10.1109/icumt.2010.5676562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework for performance based logistics: A system of systems approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A pure PBL contract could be exemplified by a system owned by the supplier during its lifecycle and where the contract only stipulates the performance that should be reached and maintained. The implicit assumption of PBL is that when the producer is given the responsibility to deliver a certain performance level and the freedom to design the product and production process accordingly, the cost will decrease (Nowicki et al, 2010). A more efficient process will result in advantages that can be shared by the supplier and the customer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A pure PBL contract could be exemplified by a system owned by the supplier during its lifecycle and where the contract only stipulates the performance that should be reached and maintained. The implicit assumption of PBL is that when the producer is given the responsibility to deliver a certain performance level and the freedom to design the product and production process accordingly, the cost will decrease (Nowicki et al, 2010). A more efficient process will result in advantages that can be shared by the supplier and the customer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Directed toward logistic support for systems such as aircrafts, vessels and vehicles (Doerr et al, 2004), PBL has recently become the primary approach for defense acquisition in the USA (Kleeman et al, 2012). Despite its usage, defining PBL has been hard (Geary and Vitasek, 2008), since all PBL-agreements must be customized to meet the system's specific operational demands (Sols et al, 2007;Nowicki et al, 2010). PBL is commonly mistaken as outsourcing of logistic support to commercial suppliers, known as contractor logistics support (CLS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results could imply that regional supply networks are self-organising complex networks, or in other words, systems of systems [25]. As it is has been shown from insights into the mining industry supply network, these structural patterns are functionally related to its operational characteristics as robustness, responsiveness, flexibility, and resilience.…”
Section: B Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Selecting such variables is challenging since customer requirements are often defined in quite abstract terms [15,16]. Usually several performance variables are used in a PBL contract, e.g availability, reliability, maintainability, supportability, logistics response time, logistic footprint and cost of usage [8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Measurements Of Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A disadvantage of implementing PBL partially, i.e. not to a whole system, may be that opportunities for economies of scale might be lost, [10]. Furthermore, defining performance measurements can be complicated if the supplier is only responsible for the performance of a part of the complete system, see [11] for a discussion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%