2013
DOI: 10.1109/tste.2012.2227343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Framework for Optimal Placement of Energy Storage Units Within a Power System With High Wind Penetration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
147
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 212 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
147
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the intermittent nature of the power produced by renewable energy sources (RESs) is threatening the stability of power systems, increasing the risk of instabilities and failures. In order to overcome this issue, various studies have proposed the exploitation of energy storage system (ESS) technologies for the management of RES power fluctuations [2][3][4][5][6][7]. The proposed solutions include the use of ESSs for the provision of spinning reserves, frequency and voltage regulation, peak shaving, and load following.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the intermittent nature of the power produced by renewable energy sources (RESs) is threatening the stability of power systems, increasing the risk of instabilities and failures. In order to overcome this issue, various studies have proposed the exploitation of energy storage system (ESS) technologies for the management of RES power fluctuations [2][3][4][5][6][7]. The proposed solutions include the use of ESSs for the provision of spinning reserves, frequency and voltage regulation, peak shaving, and load following.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5] proposed a marketbased probabilistic optimal power flow (POPF) with energy storage integration and wind generation to minimize hourly social cost and maximize wind power utilization. [6] proposed a vulnerability assessment and found the optimal locations and capacities of ESSs for power system vulnerability mitigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies incorporate operational and physical constraints through the optimal power flow (OPF) formulation, which is a nonconvex problem. Since the OPF is nonconvex and NP-hard, numerous studies solve an approximation; references [8], [9] and [10] solve a lossless approximation to assess optimal sizing and charge scheduling. This approach is problematic because actual power systems operate on alternating current (AC) networks, for which losses due to A. Castillo is with the Department of Geography and Environmental Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA anya.castillo@jhu.edu…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%