2021
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6579/ac010d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework for modeling bioimpedance measurements of nonhomogeneous tissues: a theoretical and simulation study

Abstract: Objective. Bioimpedance technology is experiencing an increased use to assess health in a wide range of new consumer, research and clinical applications. However, the interaction between tissues producing bioimpedance data is often unclear. Methods. This work provides a novel theoretical framework to model bioimpedance measurements of nonhomogeneous tissues. We consider five case studies to validate the usefulness of our approach against finite element model simulations. Results. Theoretical and FEM-simulated … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 48 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The head was presented as an overall ellipsoidal structure (a = 16 cm, b = 13 cm, c = 13 cm), where the skin thickness was 2 mm, the skull thickness was 1 cm, and the filling within the skull was assumed to be a homogeneous medium. The dielectric properties of each tissue, namely relative permittivity and conductivity, were obtained from published literature and online reference databases [ 28 , 29 , 30 ], and their specific parameters were set as shown in Table 1 .…”
Section: Feasibility Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The head was presented as an overall ellipsoidal structure (a = 16 cm, b = 13 cm, c = 13 cm), where the skin thickness was 2 mm, the skull thickness was 1 cm, and the filling within the skull was assumed to be a homogeneous medium. The dielectric properties of each tissue, namely relative permittivity and conductivity, were obtained from published literature and online reference databases [ 28 , 29 , 30 ], and their specific parameters were set as shown in Table 1 .…”
Section: Feasibility Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%