2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.09.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework for measuring global Malmquist–Luenberger productivity index with CO2 emissions on Chinese manufacturing industries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to provide usable information for this objective, the index is therefore distinguishing between a technological progress for the whole set of DMUs-individually adapted for each institution-on the one side and the technological efficiency on the other side [77]. A series of applications do exist for this specific longitudinal efficiency analysis, as shown for example by Thanassoulis, Shiraz and Maniadakis [78] for water and gas companies from different countries, Emrouznejad and Yang [79] for CO 2 emissions of Chinese manufacturing, Sueyoshi and Goto [80] for the environmental evaluation of petroleum companies, or Chang, Kuo and Chen [81] for a pollution evaluation in China.…”
Section: Efficiency Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to provide usable information for this objective, the index is therefore distinguishing between a technological progress for the whole set of DMUs-individually adapted for each institution-on the one side and the technological efficiency on the other side [77]. A series of applications do exist for this specific longitudinal efficiency analysis, as shown for example by Thanassoulis, Shiraz and Maniadakis [78] for water and gas companies from different countries, Emrouznejad and Yang [79] for CO 2 emissions of Chinese manufacturing, Sueyoshi and Goto [80] for the environmental evaluation of petroleum companies, or Chang, Kuo and Chen [81] for a pollution evaluation in China.…”
Section: Efficiency Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As its advantage at dealing with measuring the relative efficiency of decision making units with multiple inputs and outputs, DEA has been widely adopted to evaluate the energy, environmental, and carbon emission efficiency . Although DEA‐based assessment method could overcome the subjectivity exists in the index evaluation method, the static efficiency evaluation method fails to provide specific factors of trend change; the Malmquist productivity index based on the DEA method makes up for this deficiency …”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[28][29][30][31] Although DEA-based assessment method could overcome the subjectivity exists in the index evaluation method, the static efficiency evaluation method fails to provide specific factors of trend change; the Malmquist productivity index based on the DEA method makes up for this deficiency. [32][33][34][35] The third group is based on environment-economy elasticity to analyze the decoupling status of regional or industry level. Decoupling refers to two variables change at different speed, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OEDC) defined decoupling as breaking the link between "environmental bads" and "economic goods."…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhao, Ke et al [2] pointed out that more than 50% of fossil fuels are consumed directly or indirectly by the manufacturing industry. Manufacturing is responsible for nearly a third of global energy consumption and 36% of carbon dioxide emissions [3]. Consequently, the goals of improving energy efficiency and reducing emission reduction have placed great demand on the manufacturing industry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%