1992
DOI: 10.1080/1049482920020202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Framework for Learner Modelling

Abstract: This paper presents a comprehensive conceptual framework and notation for learner modelling in intelligent tutoring systems.The framework is based upon the computational distinction between behaviour, behavioural knowledge, and conceptual knowledge (in a 'vertical' dimension) and between the system, the learner, and the system's representation of the learner (in a 'horizontal' dimension). All existing techniques for learner modelling are placed within this framework. Methods for establishing the search space f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
8

Year Published

1996
1996
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
22
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…To facilitate comparisons between the actual interaction patterns and the script, both should be represented with the same scheme (or isomorphic schemes). Capturing the actual interaction patterns is close to the notion student modelling, which has been much developed in research on intelligent tutoring systems (Dillenbourg & Self 1992), then extended to the notion of group modelling and automatic interaction analysis (Mühlenbrock & Hoppe 1999; Martínez‐Monés et al 2003). The craft of identifying interaction patterns relies on the possibility to describe these patterns with interface acts rather than from natural language understanding. The script intrinsic constraints .…”
Section: Implementing Flexibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To facilitate comparisons between the actual interaction patterns and the script, both should be represented with the same scheme (or isomorphic schemes). Capturing the actual interaction patterns is close to the notion student modelling, which has been much developed in research on intelligent tutoring systems (Dillenbourg & Self 1992), then extended to the notion of group modelling and automatic interaction analysis (Mühlenbrock & Hoppe 1999; Martínez‐Monés et al 2003). The craft of identifying interaction patterns relies on the possibility to describe these patterns with interface acts rather than from natural language understanding. The script intrinsic constraints .…”
Section: Implementing Flexibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to reference knowledge, a conception has a domain of validity (the domain where it performs correct actions). A misconception (a term often used in the AI-ED community [3]) is considered here as a conception which is not 100% correct.…”
Section: Conceptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main goals are: (1) to have a map of possible students' conceptions that can be published in a mathematics education journal, with statistics concerning conceptions of real students from several countries and grades; (2) to inform the teachers who use Aplusix of the conceptions of their students after a few training and test sessions with the system in order to help them to take didactical decisions (re-teaching of a part of algebra or choice of new activities) at an individual or at a class level; (3) and to allow Aplusix choosing adequate exercises for favoring a self-correction of misconceptions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It contains knowledge and skill representations the learner should construct, the variables of the state of the learner representing the level of learning at a certain moment, and the rules about how to upgrade this information given the interaction with the system and reflected in the change from one real world model state to another. Thus, the learner model is constructed by making inferences from individual knowledge and by analyzing the performance (Dillenbourg and Self 1992).…”
Section: Learner Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%