2018
DOI: 10.1177/0022487118755700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Framework for Improvement: Analyzing Performance-Assessment Scores for Evidence-Based Teacher Preparation Program Reforms

Abstract: Teacher candidate performance assessments represent a promising source of data for evidence-based program improvement. However, teacher preparation programs (TPPs) interested in reform face a crucial question: how to identify actionable evidence in performance-assessment data. To address this concern, we propose a two-pronged empirical framework that TPPs can use to analyze performance-assessment data. The first approach, latent class analysis, creates profiles of instructional practice by grouping candidates … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(39 reference statements)
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study found that Latinx students were three times as likely as their White counterparts to fail the assessment, highlighting the issue of consequential validity and equity noted previously. Bastian, Lys, and Pan (2018) found that two edTPA factors (instruction and assessment) significantly predicted first-year value-added scores, but not state teacher evaluation scores, for elementary and middle school teachers in one EPP. Both studies examined edTPA scores from 2011–2014, before the significant growth in test takers, the increased need for raters, and the shift to the assessment being high stakes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…This study found that Latinx students were three times as likely as their White counterparts to fail the assessment, highlighting the issue of consequential validity and equity noted previously. Bastian, Lys, and Pan (2018) found that two edTPA factors (instruction and assessment) significantly predicted first-year value-added scores, but not state teacher evaluation scores, for elementary and middle school teachers in one EPP. Both studies examined edTPA scores from 2011–2014, before the significant growth in test takers, the increased need for raters, and the shift to the assessment being high stakes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The faculty met with school district representatives to co-construct courses that included high-leverage skills teachers need to be successful, in the areas of planning, instruction, and assessment, all critical dimensions of edTPA (Pearson, n.d.; Stanford Center for Assessment, Learning, and Equity-SCALE, 2017). The purpose for edTPA as a required component is because of a comprehensive, statewide study that determined predictive validity of candidate performance on edTPA and teacher effectiveness during the first years of teaching (Bastian et al, 2018). This predictive validity study drove policy in North Carolina that fulfilled the expectations for candidates to demonstrate impact on student learning in the settings where they complete their clinical experiences.…”
Section: Departmental Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have focused on the uses of data from standardized performance assessments of candidate classroom-teaching practice as a resource for program improvement (Bastian, Lys, & Pan, 2018;Bunch, Aguirre, & Téllez, 2009;Devlin-Scherer, Burroughs, Daly, & McCartan, 2007;Liu & Milman, 2013;Peck, Gallucci, & Sloan, 2010;Reusser, Butler, Symonds, Vetter, & Wall, 2007). For example, Devlin-Scherer et al (2007) investigated the ways in which data from the Teacher Work Sample (Schalock, 1998) could be used to generate recommendations for program improvement.…”
Section: Data Use In Teacher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%