2016
DOI: 10.5430/ijba.v7n1p1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Framework for Human Resource Configurations in Knowledge-intensive Organizations

Abstract: The article identified two human resource (HR) configurations --knowledge-based and commitment-based HR configurations --which would particularly improve performance of knowledge-intensive organizations. The different mechanisms of their effects on organizational performance will be discussed. We argue that knowledge-based HR configuration will directly enhance the intellectual capital, which in turn affects organizational performance; whereas commitment-based HR configuration will influence organizational per… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They are very much depended upon by the organization and this shows that these employees are not easily available in the market and nurturing of these needed skills will provide the organization with more returns on productivity (Lepak & Snell, 1999Norris, 2015). This configuration aspires to fulfil an employee's full potential and educates the employees with knowledge that is beneficial to the company (Lepak & Snell, 1999;Kang et al, 2007;Norris, 2015;Batistic et al, 2016;Lin & Tang, 2016). Organizations that associate with this configuration are invested in having a long-term relationship with its employees and shows that trust by providing and financing heavily its employees with training, education and equipping them with knowledge that not only benefits the employees but also the organization.…”
Section: A) Commitment Hr Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are very much depended upon by the organization and this shows that these employees are not easily available in the market and nurturing of these needed skills will provide the organization with more returns on productivity (Lepak & Snell, 1999Norris, 2015). This configuration aspires to fulfil an employee's full potential and educates the employees with knowledge that is beneficial to the company (Lepak & Snell, 1999;Kang et al, 2007;Norris, 2015;Batistic et al, 2016;Lin & Tang, 2016). Organizations that associate with this configuration are invested in having a long-term relationship with its employees and shows that trust by providing and financing heavily its employees with training, education and equipping them with knowledge that not only benefits the employees but also the organization.…”
Section: A) Commitment Hr Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also other conceptualizations in regard to HRM practices. Complicating the landscape of AMO, Lin and Tang (2016) argue, that to understand complex relationships between HRM practices and performance, there is a necessary distinction to be made between High Performance Work Systems (HPWS) and High Commitment Work Systems (HCWS). HPWS, as the management approach, focuses on the direct influence on performance through attitudinal structuring, for example, skill formation, quality control, and performance management.…”
Section: On the Wings Of Amo Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In consequence, they suggested that organizations that develop effective routines for acquiring human assets develop a stock of talent not easily imitated (Koch & McGrath, 1996). Furthermore, they found that these HR practices were related to labour productivity in a sample of business units and that this relationship was stronger in capital-intensive organizations (Lin & Tang, 2016). Lepak and Snell (1999) asked executives to describe the HR systems that existed for jobs that represented particular quadrants of their model and found considerable support for the idea that the value and uniqueness of skills are associated with different types of HR systems within the same organization (Lepak & Snell, 1999).…”
Section: Competencies Competency Framework and Organizational Perfomentioning
confidence: 99%