1998
DOI: 10.1007/10692867_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Framework for Evaluating System and Software Requirements Specification Approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the recommendations proposed in [13] to use the GQM template in experimentation in requirements engineering, the goal definition of our experiment can be summarised as: Analyse the Checklist and MBR techniques for the purpose of evaluating with respect to their efficiency and effectiveness from the point of view of the researcher in the context of Undergraduate Computer Science students enrolled in the fifth-year at the Computer Science School at the University of Seville.…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Based on the recommendations proposed in [13] to use the GQM template in experimentation in requirements engineering, the goal definition of our experiment can be summarised as: Analyse the Checklist and MBR techniques for the purpose of evaluating with respect to their efficiency and effectiveness from the point of view of the researcher in the context of Undergraduate Computer Science students enrolled in the fifth-year at the Computer Science School at the University of Seville.…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Kamsties and Rombach commented in [13], empirical researches can contribute to requirements engineering by evaluating the effectiveness of techniques, methods and tools. In this sense, some empirical researches have been done in the requirements inspection area, all of them designed to compare two or more reading techniques in order to know which of them is better than the other.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation