2002
DOI: 10.1177/016555150202800105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework for evaluating geographical information

Abstract: This paper introduces a framework for the evaluation of geographic information (GI), divided into representational and communicative aspects. The representational component is concerned with how 'real-world' phenomena situated in space and time come to be represented or modelled in GI, considered at ontological, modelling and system levels. The communicative component of GI is concerned with how representations of GI are understood by the users of the information, considered at relevance, commodification, expl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two specific contributions have been made to current thinking on GINs after an initial sketch in Raper et al (2002). Coppola et al (2004) suggest that one of the dimensions of Mizzaro (1998) four dimensional model of relevance i.e.…”
Section: Geographic Information Seeking and Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two specific contributions have been made to current thinking on GINs after an initial sketch in Raper et al (2002). Coppola et al (2004) suggest that one of the dimensions of Mizzaro (1998) four dimensional model of relevance i.e.…”
Section: Geographic Information Seeking and Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the role of geo-representation in GI has been extensively explored in the geographic information systems (GIS) literature (Worboys and Duckham, 2004), less attention has been paid to the communicative processes needed to ensure that GI is relevant, appropriate and understandable to users (Raper et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A GIS that integrates 2D and 3D views of the same data is described in [16]. A system that incorporates some error capabilities is LandSerf [17], including shaded relief, curvature visualization, peak classification, and others. LandSerf is also very useful in generating contours and reading/writing many file formats.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The profile cutter is a planar rectangle orthogonal to the surface that enables the viewer to make a vertical "slice" through the DEM to better see the profile at any x or y position. The general idea is similar to the functionality included in LandSerf [17] in which a profile with any two endpoints can be displayed; however, the surface context of the profile is lost. In DEMEV, alpha blending makes the cutter semi-transparent, thus showing the profile within the context of the remaining DEM in the background.…”
Section: The Profile Cuttermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the possibility of knowing beforehand the spatial distribution of pollutants enables the spatial planning of a monitoring procedure that is usually required in cases such as these. The integration of analytical models, spatial data and methods of representing numeric data directly over a map using adequate graphical metaphors thus makes possible an improvement of both the representational and communicative processes (Dykes, 1997;MacEachren, 1995;Raper et al, 2002). This integration is potentially effective in overcoming some of the problems that make the use of some models in environmental analysis and planning difficult (Wang et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%