1991
DOI: 10.1177/002246699102500102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Framework for Ethical Deliberation in Special Education

Abstract: Developing largely out of an awakened commitment to the ethical requirement that all individuals be provided with access to a decent public education, special education has had a strong ethical component from its inception. Because it challenges traditional organizational structures and the knowledge and skills of teachers, it has continued to engender many ethical dilemmas. Despite this fact, the ethics of special education has received scant attention, either as a field of ethical inquiry or as a topic in te… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
3

Year Published

1994
1994
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
12
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent interest in the moral dimensions of teaching (Strike & Soltis, 1988;Goodlad et al, 1990;Sergiovanni, 1990;Howe, 1993;and, Wheeler, 2004, for example) has led to a spate of writing on ethical issues in other areas of education. Special educators also have taken up the topic of ethics, but few references have appeared in the professional special education literature since the 1983 special issue of Exceptional Children about professional standards (See, for example, Howe & Miramontes, 1991;Howe & Miramontes, 1992;Dillon, 1993). Yet, the education/special education discussions up to this point in time tend to be directed toward the mix of law and ethics ignoring, we believe, the more important conversation of determining what is just, what is right, what ought to be done as issues of importance that Kohlberg (1981), Reimer, Paolitto & Hersh (1983), Schrader (1990), Gilligan (1982;1988), Noddings (1990Noddings ( , 1992Noddings ( 1999Noddings ( , 1984; Stevens & Wood (1987), Peters (1978), Scheffler (1973), Rawls (1971;, and Jackson, Boostrom, & Hansen (1993) presented in their extensive discussions of moral reasoning, ethical deliberations, caring, and justice.…”
Section: Ethics In Special Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent interest in the moral dimensions of teaching (Strike & Soltis, 1988;Goodlad et al, 1990;Sergiovanni, 1990;Howe, 1993;and, Wheeler, 2004, for example) has led to a spate of writing on ethical issues in other areas of education. Special educators also have taken up the topic of ethics, but few references have appeared in the professional special education literature since the 1983 special issue of Exceptional Children about professional standards (See, for example, Howe & Miramontes, 1991;Howe & Miramontes, 1992;Dillon, 1993). Yet, the education/special education discussions up to this point in time tend to be directed toward the mix of law and ethics ignoring, we believe, the more important conversation of determining what is just, what is right, what ought to be done as issues of importance that Kohlberg (1981), Reimer, Paolitto & Hersh (1983), Schrader (1990), Gilligan (1982;1988), Noddings (1990Noddings ( , 1992Noddings ( 1999Noddings ( , 1984; Stevens & Wood (1987), Peters (1978), Scheffler (1973), Rawls (1971;, and Jackson, Boostrom, & Hansen (1993) presented in their extensive discussions of moral reasoning, ethical deliberations, caring, and justice.…”
Section: Ethics In Special Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ethical dilemmas in special education are well documented and are often defined as a situation that forces educators or educational leaders to choose among competing interests, such as determining the placement of a child with an emotional-behavioral disability and maintaining the safety of other students (Fiedler & Van Haren, 2008). Ethical dilemmas may also occur as a result of concerns about overrepresentation and disputes over inclusion (artiles, 1998), as well as demands for scarce resources and pressures to maximize educational potential (Howe & Miramontes, 1991). Ensuring that special education leaders are informed by both legal and ethical principles is critical, given the increasing numbers of students identified as disabled (U.S. Department of Education, 2010), serious concerns about overrepresentation of minority students (see, e.g., arnold & lassmann, 2003;Larry P. v. Riles, 1972), and significant financial and emotional costs associated with poor leadership (Mueller, Singer, & Draper, 2008).…”
Section: Special Education Leadership: Integrating Professional and Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Howe and Miramontes (1991) recognized that ethical questions are related to legal questions, they cautioned against the tendency to oversimplify the relationship between law and ethics. In other words, law and ethics are related, but they do not always coincide.…”
Section: Special Education Leadership: Integrating Professional and Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(p. 2) Suspensions and expulsions also have been a long-standing contentious issue for schools and families of children with disabilities. Howe and Miramontes (1991) propose that ethical problems often become magnified in special education for two reasons. First, special education has a strong ethical commitment to provide all individuals access to public education, regardless of how they might differ from the general population.…”
Section: Discipline and Special Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%