2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2020.113363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework for efficient isogeometric computations of phase-field brittle fracture in multipatch shell structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…36,37 Taken together, the phase-field approach to fracture applied to shells has been subject of extensive research in the recent years, focusing mainly on the extension to specific problems, namely ductile fracture, 38 finite strains, 39 functionally graded materials, 40 thick shells, 41 dynamic problems 42,43 as well as the isogeometric implementation with adaptive refinement 44 or multipatch coupling techniques. 45 However, the application of the phase-field approach to model cracks along the thickness direction of shells has been given very limited attention up until now. To the author's best knowledge, except two contributions, 46,47 all of the aforementioned models consider the phase-field to be constant along the thickness direction of shells argued for with their slenderness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…36,37 Taken together, the phase-field approach to fracture applied to shells has been subject of extensive research in the recent years, focusing mainly on the extension to specific problems, namely ductile fracture, 38 finite strains, 39 functionally graded materials, 40 thick shells, 41 dynamic problems 42,43 as well as the isogeometric implementation with adaptive refinement 44 or multipatch coupling techniques. 45 However, the application of the phase-field approach to model cracks along the thickness direction of shells has been given very limited attention up until now. To the author's best knowledge, except two contributions, 46,47 all of the aforementioned models consider the phase-field to be constant along the thickness direction of shells argued for with their slenderness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further approaches to deal with the thinness of the structure in the context of phase‐field modeling exist, such as a formulation with a mixed interpolation of tensorial components (MITC)4+ RM degenerated shell 35 and a solid‐shell approach 36,37 . Taken together, the phase‐field approach to fracture applied to shells has been subject of extensive research in the recent years, focusing mainly on the extension to specific problems, namely ductile fracture, 38 finite strains, 39 functionally graded materials, 40 thick shells, 41 dynamic problems 42,43 as well as the isogeometric implementation with adaptive refinement 44 or multipatch coupling techniques 45 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isogeometric analysis has been used within several applications for shell structures, e.g. it has been applied in fracture (Ambati and De Lorenzis, 2016;Kiendl et al, 2016;Paul et al, 2020b;Proserpio et al, 2020):, shape and topology optimization (Nagy et al, 2013;Kiendl et al, 2014;Hirschler et al, 2019), elasto-plasticity (Ambati et al, 2018;Huynh et al, 2020), composite shells (Thai et al, 2012;Deng et al, 2015;Roohbakhshan and Sauer, 2016;Schulte et al, 2020), inverse analysis (Vu-Bac et al, 2018Borzeszkowski et al, 2022), Cahn-Hilliard phase separations (Valizadeh and Rabczuk, 2019;Zimmermann et al, 2019), biological shells (Tepole et al, 2015;Roohbakhshan and Sauer, 2017), and surfactants (Roohbakhshan and Sauer, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, isogeometric KL shells [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47] have gained popularity in the simulation and analysis community due to their computationally efficient rotation-free formulation and model simplification into the midsurface representation. The formulations have been previously demonstrated as an effective solution for the analysis of complex problems [48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61], including wind turbine blades [62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72] and heart valves [73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81]. While computational efficiency is an important factor in numerical analysis, KL shells have limited accuracy in predicting the transverse stress and strain states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%