2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2012.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework for developing word fragment completion tasks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is counter to the majority of the literature (e.g., Hirshman and Bjork, 1988;Richland et al, 2005) and we present several explanations for this finding. First, the word fragment task was not well executed in terms of using a standardized method for developing materials as suggested by Koopman et al (2013). Because an item analysis was not done prior to using these word fragment tasks, it may not be a reliable measure for distinguishing between participants' performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is counter to the majority of the literature (e.g., Hirshman and Bjork, 1988;Richland et al, 2005) and we present several explanations for this finding. First, the word fragment task was not well executed in terms of using a standardized method for developing materials as suggested by Koopman et al (2013). Because an item analysis was not done prior to using these word fragment tasks, it may not be a reliable measure for distinguishing between participants' performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Completion Task (e.g., Johnson & Lord, 2010;Vargas et al, 2007) that had been modified to assess implicit safety and fear construct activation when participants were primed with images of either White male police officers or civilians. Creation of the Word Fragment Completion Task followed the guidelines outlined by Koopman, Howe, Johnson, Tan, and Chang (2013). In the process of creating the task, words relating to the constructs of safety and fear were compiled from the sample population (i.e., college students); students were asked to provide words that were closely related to safety or fear, and the seven most frequently reported words were used for the task.…”
Section: Implicit Attitude Measure Participants Completed a Version mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the process of creating the task, words relating to the constructs of safety and fear were compiled from the sample population (i.e., college students); students were asked to provide words that were closely related to safety or fear, and the seven most frequently reported words were used for the task. Although Koopman et al (2013) recommended 12-15 words per construct, the study design required additional "filler" words, making the burden on participants too high.…”
Section: Implicit Attitude Measure Participants Completed a Version mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 10‐s time limit was implemented to prevent extensive reflection during word completions. Following Koopman, Howe, Johnson, Tan, and Chang's () recommendations, some of the word fragments had specific letters missing, and others were incomplete word stems. In total, the word fragment/stem completion material was composed of 40 word fragments: 20 were target words, which could be completed to form helpfulness‐related words, and 20 were neutral words with regard to helpfulness.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%