A framework for developing an evidence-based, comprehensive tobacco control program

Abstract

Background: Tobacco control is an area where the translation of evidence into policy would seem to be straightforward, given the wealth of epidemiological, behavioural and other types of research available. Yet, even here challenges exist. These include information overload, concealment of key (industry-funded) evidence, contextualization, assessment of population impact, and the changing nature of the threat. Methods:In the context of Israel's health targeting initiative, Healthy Israel 2020, we describe the steps taken to develop a comprehensive tobacco control strategy. We elaborate on the following: a) scientific issues influencing the choice of tobacco control strategies; b) organization of existing evidence of effectiveness of interventions into a manageable form, and c) consideration of relevant philosophical and political issues. We propose a framework for developing a plan and illustrate this process with a case study in Israel.Results: Broad consensus exists regarding the effectiveness of most interventions, but current recommendations differ in the emphasis they place on different strategies. Scientific challenges include integration of complex and sometimes conflicting information from authoritative sources, and lack of estimates of population impact of interventions. Philosophical and political challenges include the use of evidence-based versus innovative policymaking, the importance of individual versus governmental responsibility, and whether and how interventions should be prioritized.The proposed framework includes: 1) compilation of a list of potential interventions 2) modification of that list based on local needs and political constraints; 3) streamlining the list by categorizing interventions into broad groupings of related interventions; together these groupings form the basis of a comprehensive plan; and 4) refinement of the plan by comparing it to existing comprehensive plans.Conclusions: Development of a comprehensive tobacco control plan is a complex endeavour, involving crucial decisions regarding intervention components. "Off the shelf" plans, which need to be adapted to local settings, are available from a variety of sources, and a multitude of individual recommendations are available. The proposed framework for adapting existing approaches to the local social and political climate may assist others planning for smoke-free societies. Additionally, this experience has implications for development of evidence-based health plans addressing other risk factors. BackgroundControlling tobacco use, the leading preventable cause of death in the world today [1], remains an elusive goal. The combination of the addictive nature of smoking, industry activity, and tax revenue to governments complicate control attempts. Greater understanding of the enormity of

Parental receptivity to child biomarker testing for tobacco smoke exposure: A qualitative study

“…It is important to explain to parents the benefit of biomarker tests for children's TSE regardless of the results: Specifically, it can reassure parents whose children are found not to be exposed and can help motivate change among parents whose children are found to be exposed. 4. Given the prevalence of parental concerns regarding the invasiveness of some of the tests, non-invasive tests should be offered according to their preference.…”

“…Despite the broad consensus about the need to protect children from tobacco smoke (US Surgeon General [1], WHO[2], the G8 [3], Healthy Israel 2020 [4]), questions remain about how to reduce smoking around children, in particular in their home environment. Thus, at the individual level, an important challenge is to convey to parents the risk to their children caused by their own or family members' smoking behaviors, and to persuade them to refrain from smoking in places where children live, study, and play.…”

“…Reduction of child exposure to tobacco smoke is an important global health challenge [1][2][3][4], and depends to a large degree on parental beliefs and practices. Worldwide, it is estimated that 40% of children are exposed to tobacco smoke in their homes [5], with most exposure caused by parental smoking.…”

Global prevention and control of NCDs: Limitations of the standard approach

“…82 The core elements of an anti-smoking strategy are now recognized as bans on smoking in public places, restrictions on marketing (including standardized packaging), and increased taxes, with individualized approaches such as nicotine replacement playing a subsidiary role. 83 These measures are intended to achieve 'optimal defaults', 84 recognizing that individual choices must be made, but that the environment affects the content of choice. Of course, it should not be assumed that these success stories will work in LMICs -where much of the food industry is small scale and unregulated and lack of enforcement makes bans unworkable -but they do imply that analogous strategies need to be developed for LMICs.…”

‘Balancing acts’: The politics and processes of smokefree area policymaking in a small state

“…Assumptions of the primacy of 'evidence-based' policy does not take into account the personal aspects of the policy process, and 'the mismatch of randomized thinking with nonrandom problems' [47]. For tobacco control policy, there are further inherent challenges to evidence-based policymaking, including 'the integration of complex and sometimes conflicting information from authoritative sources', and 'the importance of individual versus governmental responsibility' [48].…”