2015 13th International Conference on Telecommunications (ConTEL) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/contel.2015.7231211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework for automatic testing of medical device compatibility

Abstract: A vast amount of international research projects has recently been dealing with the development of an open communication standard to enhance medical device interoperability. Most approaches target a service oriented architecture based on Ethernet bus systems. Medical devices are connected to the bus and provide or consume data and applications via so-called services. For automatic discovery of device services within the network, devices possess selfdescriptions (profiles) that specify the services offered by t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the above data transmission framework is derived from the 11073-20601 optimization exchange protocol, it is necessary to determine whether the data stream sent by the instantiated object that implements this standard meets the 20601 standard [ 16 ]. If the instantiated object of the treadmill interoperability framework passes the test, it indicates that the content it sends can have the same semantic grammar as the information sent by other devices that have met the 11073-PHD protocol family [ 17 ]. The testing content of this article will focus on the 3 models [ 18 , 19 ] of 11073-PHD, namely, (1) PHD DIM, (2) PHD service model, and (3) PHD communication model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the above data transmission framework is derived from the 11073-20601 optimization exchange protocol, it is necessary to determine whether the data stream sent by the instantiated object that implements this standard meets the 20601 standard [ 16 ]. If the instantiated object of the treadmill interoperability framework passes the test, it indicates that the content it sends can have the same semantic grammar as the information sent by other devices that have met the 11073-PHD protocol family [ 17 ]. The testing content of this article will focus on the 3 models [ 18 , 19 ] of 11073-PHD, namely, (1) PHD DIM, (2) PHD service model, and (3) PHD communication model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the above data transmission framework is derived from the 11073-20601 optimization exchange protocol, it is necessary to determine whether the data stream sent by the instantiated object that implements this standard meets the 20601 standard [16]. If the instantiated object of the treadmill interoperability framework passes the test, it indicates that the content it sends can have the same semantic grammar as the information sent by other devices that have met the 11073-PHD protocol family [17]. The testing content of this article will focus on the 3 models [18,19] • MDS-Configuration-Event: If the manager cannot learn the current agent configuration information from the associated historical records, the agent sends the event to the manager during the startup of the "configuration" state.…”
Section: Standard Compliance Testing Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our integration scenario, this commissioning process shall also be used to ingrate a device into the real-time architecture and the cyclic message plan. Therefore the compatibility of different devices has to be evaluated using different verification and validation-techniques as described in [15].…”
Section: Plugging New Devices At Runtimementioning
confidence: 99%