2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2022.104917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework for assessing tunnel drainage-induced impact on terrestrial vegetation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cherkasov et al (2018) proposed that longterm monitoring could be accomplished by high-precision repeated UAV surveys. Gokdemir et al (2023) used handheld TIR and regional TIR studies to establish baseline environmental conditions to establish a detailed method to assess tunnel drainage and its impact on surface vegetation. Their method is highly quantitative and establishes a vulnerability index based on rooting depths and the tunnel dewatering impacts on plant root depths of differing subsurface locations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cherkasov et al (2018) proposed that longterm monitoring could be accomplished by high-precision repeated UAV surveys. Gokdemir et al (2023) used handheld TIR and regional TIR studies to establish baseline environmental conditions to establish a detailed method to assess tunnel drainage and its impact on surface vegetation. Their method is highly quantitative and establishes a vulnerability index based on rooting depths and the tunnel dewatering impacts on plant root depths of differing subsurface locations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil, plant, and atmosphere are regarded as dynamic physical systems in which energy transfer and material (water) transport occur all the time [31]. At present, this model has been widely used in agricultural research [32][33][34], but few studies have applied it to the effect of tunnel excavation on plants. The previous studies mostly ana-lyzed the effect of a tunnel excavation on local plants from the perspective of soil water matrix potential (SWMP) [35,36], but ignored other fluxes in the SPAC model, and did not further apply them to the study of ecological water level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%