2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103203
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework for assessing the effects of shock events on livestock and environment in sub-Saharan Africa: The COVID-19 pandemic in Northern Kenya

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Graham et al (2021) outlined a framework to rapidly assess whether pandemic shocks have impacted GHG emissions from the livestock sector in Kenya. They described different pathways between the pandemic and emissions, including changes in herd sizes, feed availability and decreased animal movements due to COVID-19 mitigation measures and market closures.…”
Section: Regional Summaries and Articlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… Graham et al (2021) outlined a framework to rapidly assess whether pandemic shocks have impacted GHG emissions from the livestock sector in Kenya. They described different pathways between the pandemic and emissions, including changes in herd sizes, feed availability and decreased animal movements due to COVID-19 mitigation measures and market closures.…”
Section: Regional Summaries and Articlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A desire to ‘Build Back Better’ can be observed in several submissions. Andrieu et al (2021) and Graham et al (2021) both estimated the impact of the pandemic on GHG emissions in agricultural systems. They showed both that the pandemic has impacted GHG emissions which are a significant agricultural policy target in many countries, but also that COVID-19 policy has the potential to undo progress made on climate mitigation policy for agriculture if the policy environment for agriculture is not examined more holistically.…”
Section: Emergent Themes From the Special Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flexibility in data type and the ability to change tasks is a huge benefit in some situations. For example, at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, it was quick and easy to create a set of shock-specific tasks that were rolled out and completed despite the restrictions imposed on movement between the location where researchers and managers were, and where the data were (see Chelanga et al, 2020;Graham, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown by the health messaging during the Covid-19 pandemic, urban populations may be willing yet simply unable to follow health messages when their livelihoods are also at risk [ 29 ]. For zoonotic livestock diseases, this effect is compounded for those that rely on livestock in urban settings and suddenly lose employment, market access, and purchasing power from closure of livestock markets and restriction of animal movement [ 30 ]. As RVF outbreaks have occurred in a variety of ecosystems [ 31 ], understanding the key difference between rural and urban risk could allow for inclusive, targeted, public health responses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%