2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2022.106338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework for assessing harvest strategy choice when considering multiple interacting fisheries and a changing environment: The example of eastern Bering Sea crab stocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Duplisea et al (2021) proposed the use of empirical or phenomenological models to provide broad predictive capacity to quantify future states to manage risks associated with management decisions under plausible future environmental conditions and fishery objectives. Similar to environmentally conditioned MSEs (Kaplan et al, 2021; Punt et al, 2022), Monte Carlo simulations based on the underlying environmental effect on population response provide projections of the probability of achieving the objectives through time while allowing an assessment of the importance of environmental change on stock dynamics but without the complexity of an MSE. Successive and consistent departures from projections can serve to assess whether other factors may be driving stock dynamics or that changes in baseline conditions may require a re‐evaluation of the stock's production potential and fishery objectives.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Duplisea et al (2021) proposed the use of empirical or phenomenological models to provide broad predictive capacity to quantify future states to manage risks associated with management decisions under plausible future environmental conditions and fishery objectives. Similar to environmentally conditioned MSEs (Kaplan et al, 2021; Punt et al, 2022), Monte Carlo simulations based on the underlying environmental effect on population response provide projections of the probability of achieving the objectives through time while allowing an assessment of the importance of environmental change on stock dynamics but without the complexity of an MSE. Successive and consistent departures from projections can serve to assess whether other factors may be driving stock dynamics or that changes in baseline conditions may require a re‐evaluation of the stock's production potential and fishery objectives.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the application of such fundamental research in stock assessments remains limited globally (Bell et al, 2020; Marshall et al, 2019; Skern‐Mauritzen et al, 2016), and is subject to error and breakdown (King et al, 2015; Myers, 1998; Szuwalski & Hollowed, 2016). Environmental effects are often implicit in management strategy evaluations (MSE) (Punt, A’mar, et al, 2014) although there are several instances in which the potential consequences of environmental effects are explicitly considered (Kaplan et al, 2021; Punt et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the components and spatio‐temporal scales of the ecosystem model should fit the management purpose and model capability, and it should focus on the ecosystem components directly affected by the management action (Geary et al, 2020). Finally, less data‐demanding approaches which also allow the incorporation of ecosystem realism into the management advice exist, such as adjusting single species reference points with ecosystem information (Howell et al, 2021), implementing risk‐equivalent empirical approaches (Duplisea et al, 2021) and explicitly including environmental effects in the single species MSE process (Hill et al, 2017; Punt et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of unavailability of multispecies and/or ecosystem model, a way to include ecosystem realism into the advice is by explicitly considering environmental factors in the single‐species MSE process. For example, Punt et al, 2022 developed a framework to integrate the effect of temperature and pH on growth and survival of king and snow crab, and decide on harvest control rules. Another example is the case of the Pacific sardine, which management includes the use of an environmental buffer (so called EMSY) to account for the impact of temperature on the productivity of the stock.…”
Section: Managing Marine Biological Resources In a Changing Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adults and first stage larvae calcify faster in response to low pH (Long et al, 2013a) and juveniles maintain calcification levels (Long et al, 2013b); however, despite this, changes to the cuticle lead to thinning of the carapace and decreased hardness in the chelas in juveniles at low pH (Coffey et al, 2017). These effects are predicted to have a negative effect on the red king crab population and fisheries in Alaska in the near future (Punt et al, 2014; Punt et al, 2022) Nothing is known about the response of larvae past the first stage to low pH, so, in this study, we reared red king crab larvae from hatching to the first crab stage in four different pH treatments to fill this critical gap.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%