Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 2006
DOI: 10.1145/1150402.1150462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework for analysis of dynamic social networks

Abstract: Finding patterns of social interaction within a population has wide-ranging applications including: disease modeling, cultural and information transmission, and behavioral ecology. Social interactions are often modeled with networks. A key characteristic of social interactions is their continual change. However, most past analyses of social networks are essentially static in that all information about the time that social interactions take place is discarded. In this paper, we propose a new mathematical and co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
91
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This correlates to results from comparing clustering in social networks to that of non-human networks where interactions are defined more by network topology than other affinity measures; for instance, the Internet topology compared to the Live-Journal community (Kumar, Novak, Raghavan & Tomkins 2004). Centrality measures are valuable in quantifying network topologies; evaluating these metrics on dynamic and evolving networks is an open research question and the authors leave centrality evaluation to future work (Berger-Wolf & Saia 2006). Quantitative analysis of DynSNIC's infection dynamic capabilities, in conjunction with health policies and interventions strategies, is provided in the following case study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…This correlates to results from comparing clustering in social networks to that of non-human networks where interactions are defined more by network topology than other affinity measures; for instance, the Internet topology compared to the Live-Journal community (Kumar, Novak, Raghavan & Tomkins 2004). Centrality measures are valuable in quantifying network topologies; evaluating these metrics on dynamic and evolving networks is an open research question and the authors leave centrality evaluation to future work (Berger-Wolf & Saia 2006). Quantitative analysis of DynSNIC's infection dynamic capabilities, in conjunction with health policies and interventions strategies, is provided in the following case study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The traditional static social analysis method has a significant disadvantage that it ignores the important factors that cause network status change [7], which results in information deficiency. For example, this method ignores the connections between different individuals, the mutual effects between related individuals and time-related change trend [8]. Second method: use the graph partitioning method, i.e.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social network analysis is used to understand the pattern of interaction caused by social dynamics and events [8,9,10,11,12,13]. One special kind of network is known as social network and has been studying for long time [3,4,5,6].…”
Section: Social Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%