2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fracture behaviour evaluation of Glass/Elium150 thermoplastic laminate with the DCB test: Influence of loading rate and temperature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From Figure 7(A), the global set of results show that the initial specimen stiffness (the slope of the line in the linear portion of the curve) is not obviously affected in the range of temperatures tested, except for a very small decrease in stiffness for the DCB specimens that were tested at À20 C and 90 C. The slight difference in stiffness caused by temperature was also reported by Coronado et al [1] and Cadieu et al. [38] This may be due to the slight difference in initial crack length for the DCB specimens, or the integrated effect of composite components and the PTFE film. Further investigation is necessary to understand this and will be studied in future work.…”
Section: Load-displacement Curvessupporting
confidence: 76%
“…From Figure 7(A), the global set of results show that the initial specimen stiffness (the slope of the line in the linear portion of the curve) is not obviously affected in the range of temperatures tested, except for a very small decrease in stiffness for the DCB specimens that were tested at À20 C and 90 C. The slight difference in stiffness caused by temperature was also reported by Coronado et al [1] and Cadieu et al. [38] This may be due to the slight difference in initial crack length for the DCB specimens, or the integrated effect of composite components and the PTFE film. Further investigation is necessary to understand this and will be studied in future work.…”
Section: Load-displacement Curvessupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The large instantaneous drop of load at lower temperatures could be attributed to brittleness in the composite that leads to a sudden release of the energy during crack propagation. However, for 110 °C, the higher temperatures increased the overall ductility of the adhesive, making crack propagation much smoother [ 19 ]. The effects of temperature on the increased ductility and gradual stress release during crack initiation are less well captured in cohesive models.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the ENF top roller moves downward at an increasing rate up to a maximum of 0.5 m/s. The loading rate at the time of crack initiation below 0.5 m/s ensures minimal effects on the cohesive properties [ 19 ]. To minimise computational time, the elements are reduced by using half models since both cases are symmetrical across the length.…”
Section: Finite Element Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, δ f m and δ 0 m specify the effective displacement at complete failure and that relative to the effective displacement at the initiation of damage, respectively; G c is the energy dissipated due to failure; and η is a material parameter [35]. The adhesion strength between the cover and core layers decreased sharply wit increasing temperature, as the higher temperatures increased the overall ductility o adhesive, making crack propagation much smoother [36]. The properties of the coh elements in this study were defined based on the results presented in previous st [37,38], in which the peak traction stresses in the normal and shear modes were red by 83 % each when the temperature increased from RT to 110 °C for an epoxy-base hesive.…”
Section: Finite Element Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%