2018
DOI: 10.1002/num.22306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fourth‐order H1‐Galerkin mixed finite element method for Kuramoto–Sivashinsky equation

Abstract: KEYWORDScubic spline, H 1 -Galerkin mixed method, Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation, optimal-order error estimates, semi-discrete and fully discrete schemes, instability of solution Classification Codes. 65N30; 65N15; 65M60; 65M15; 35G20.Numer Methods Partial Differential Eq. 2019;35:445-477. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/num

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finite element solutions for the KS equation are not common because the primal variational formulation of fourth-order operators requires finite element basis functions which are piecewise smooth and globally at least C 1 -continuous. Although the KS equation has been studied numerically by several schemes such as local discontinuous Galerkin methods [41], finite elements [11,2], variable mesh finite difference methods [30], B-spline finite difference-collocation method [26], the inverse scattering method [13], a higher-order finite element approach [4], finite difference [1,36,29,31], spectral method [5]. In this paper, a new numeric solution for the KS equation is obtained by introducing a θ-scheme/Adams-Bashforth algorithm for the time discretization and P 1 -type Lagrange polynomials for the spatial approximation.…”
Section: Characterization Of the Robust Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finite element solutions for the KS equation are not common because the primal variational formulation of fourth-order operators requires finite element basis functions which are piecewise smooth and globally at least C 1 -continuous. Although the KS equation has been studied numerically by several schemes such as local discontinuous Galerkin methods [41], finite elements [11,2], variable mesh finite difference methods [30], B-spline finite difference-collocation method [26], the inverse scattering method [13], a higher-order finite element approach [4], finite difference [1,36,29,31], spectral method [5]. In this paper, a new numeric solution for the KS equation is obtained by introducing a θ-scheme/Adams-Bashforth algorithm for the time discretization and P 1 -type Lagrange polynomials for the spatial approximation.…”
Section: Characterization Of the Robust Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also established the existence and uniqueness of a continuous solution of fractional KS equation, using the fixed‐point theorem and the Picard–Lindelöf approach. Doss and Nandini 25 adapted H 1 Galerkin finite element method with cubic B‐spline as basis functions. The splitting technique was used, which resulted in a coupled system of equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e nonconforming MFEM brings down the smoothness requirement on FE solution compared to the conforming case. Readers with more interests may refer [11][12][13][14][15] and the references listed. For problem (1), Omrani [1] developed the convergence analysis of the corresponding variables in the semidiscrete and fullydiscrete schemes by using conforming MFEM; however, situation involving nonconforming MFEM was not available till now.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%