2022
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.897827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Four-MicroRNA Panel in Serum as a Potential Biomarker for Screening Renal Cell Carcinoma

Abstract: Background: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has been a major health problem and is one of the most malignant tumors around the world. Serum microRNA (miRNA) profiles previously have been reported as non-invasive biomarkers in cancer screening. The aim of this study was to explore serum miRNAs as potential biomarkers for screening RCC.Methods: A three-phase study was conducted to explore serum miRNAs as potential biomarkers for screening RCC. In the screening phase, 12 candidate miRNAs related to RCC were selected f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(63 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the studies, the AUC of a four-miRNA panel for RCC diagnosis, containing miR-1-3p, miR-155-5p, miR-200b-3p, and miR-224-5p, was 0.903 (95% CI: 0.847-0.944; p < 0.001; sensitivity = 75.61%, speci city = 93.67%) 38 . Similarly, the AUC of another four-miRNA panel, containing miR-18a-5p, miR-138-5p miR-141-3p, and miR-181b-5p, was 0.908 (95% CI: 0.852-0.948; sensitivity = 80.77%, speci city = 88.89%) 39 . Our study reported that the AUC of a three-miRNA panel for KIRC diagnosis, including miR-1-3p, miR-129-5p and miR-146b-5p, was 0.895(95% CI: 0.848 to 0.942; sensitivity = 89.30%, speci city = 76.19%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…During the studies, the AUC of a four-miRNA panel for RCC diagnosis, containing miR-1-3p, miR-155-5p, miR-200b-3p, and miR-224-5p, was 0.903 (95% CI: 0.847-0.944; p < 0.001; sensitivity = 75.61%, speci city = 93.67%) 38 . Similarly, the AUC of another four-miRNA panel, containing miR-18a-5p, miR-138-5p miR-141-3p, and miR-181b-5p, was 0.908 (95% CI: 0.852-0.948; sensitivity = 80.77%, speci city = 88.89%) 39 . Our study reported that the AUC of a three-miRNA panel for KIRC diagnosis, including miR-1-3p, miR-129-5p and miR-146b-5p, was 0.895(95% CI: 0.848 to 0.942; sensitivity = 89.30%, speci city = 76.19%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The AUC of a four-miRNA panel for RCC diagnosis containing miR-1-3p, miR-155-5p, miR-200b-3p, and miR-224-5p was 0.903 (95% CI 0.847–0.944; p < 0.001; sensitivity = 75.61%; specificity = 93.67%) [ 44 ]. Similarly, the AUC of another four-miRNA panel, containing miR-18a-5p, miR-138-5p, miR-141-3p, and miR-181b-5p, was 0.908 (95% CI 0.852–0.948; sensitivity = 80.77%, specificity = 88.89%) [ 45 ]. In our study, the AUC of a three-miRNA panel, including miR-1-3p, miR-129-5p, and miR-146b-5p, for KIRC diagnosis, was 0.895 (95% CI 0.848 to 0.942; sensitivity = 89.30%, specificity = 76.19%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…miRNAs directly secreted into the plasma by RCC tumor or stromal cells have also been proven to be stable in humans and were reliably isolated via RT-qPCR of a centrifuged miRNA phase [16][17][18]. Serum represents another ideal biofluid for miRNA isolation in RCC, with numerous protocols describing the isolation of multiple miRNA targets via RT-qPCR of human serum, showing the reliability of the biofluid as a substrate for the design of diagnostic panels [19][20][21][22][23]. Techniques for the isolation of exosomal miRNA from the serum of patients affected by ccRCC have also been presented, including the use of antibody-conjugated magnetic beads for exosome extraction [24,25].…”
Section: Mirna Isolationmentioning
confidence: 99%