2016
DOI: 10.1142/s2424905x16500069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Four-DOF Laparo-Endoscopic Single Site Platform for Rapidly-Developing Next-Generation Surgical Robotics

Abstract: Minimally-invasive laparoscopic procedures have proven efficacy for a wide range of surgical procedures, but have notable shortcomings, including limited instrument motion and reduced dexterity. Endoscopic robots, like the intuitive surgical da Vinci system, have become an effective tool for many types of surgeries; however, these tools still have fundamental limitations with manipulator access, which reduces their effectiveness for many surgical procedures, like colectomy, cholecystectomy, and gynecologic onc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several groups citing the Raven system have developed complete or nearly complete surgical robotic systems [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. These systems often address new surgical procedures (such as pediatric cases or needle guidance) [6,9,10] novel delivery modes [8] or integration of industrial manipulators into surgery [12] Numerous groups have developed new hardware influenced by the Raven design [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] or focused on numerical optimization of mechansims [23]. Key aspects of these designs are minimally invasive character, often making a contribution such as novel mechanisms for decoupling motion at the laparoscopic entry port [13], decoupling drive axes [16], or reducing weight and size [19].…”
Section: Research Citing Raven But Not Using Ravenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several groups citing the Raven system have developed complete or nearly complete surgical robotic systems [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. These systems often address new surgical procedures (such as pediatric cases or needle guidance) [6,9,10] novel delivery modes [8] or integration of industrial manipulators into surgery [12] Numerous groups have developed new hardware influenced by the Raven design [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] or focused on numerical optimization of mechansims [23]. Key aspects of these designs are minimally invasive character, often making a contribution such as novel mechanisms for decoupling motion at the laparoscopic entry port [13], decoupling drive axes [16], or reducing weight and size [19].…”
Section: Research Citing Raven But Not Using Ravenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several groups citing the Raven system have developed complete or nearly complete surgical robotic systems [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. These systems often address new surgical procedures (such as pediatric cases or needle guidance) [6,9,10] novel delivery modes [8] or integration of industrial manipulators into surgery [12] Numerous groups have developed new hardware influenced by the Raven design [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] or focused on numerical optimization of mechansims [23]. Key aspects of these designs are minimally invasive character, often making a contribution such as novel mechanisms for decoupling motion at the laparoscopic entry port [13], decoupling drive axes [16], or reducing weight and size [19].…”
Section: Research Citing Raven But Not Using Ravenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, as in EndoWrist in the da Vinci system, additional joints called wrist joints are generally applied near the end‐effector of the tool. In the case of single‐port surgery, more degrees of freedom (DOFs) with elbow or shoulder joints are often implemented to overcome the more limited entrance location and the crowded workspace compared with the condition in multi‐port surgery . As the addition of joints and the tool rigidity have a trade‐off relationship related to the payload, many researchers are exploring new ways of using various materials and new joint drive mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the slave manipulators, which were developed through various design and control methods, commercialized general‐purpose haptic devices, such as Phantom Omni (SensAble, USA), Sigma, and Omega.X series (Force Dimension, Switzerland), are frequently integrated into many systems as master devices. One of the most familiar haptic devices, Phantom Omni, was adopted by Cubrich et al . and also implemented in the Raven system .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%