A Foundation for the Study of Group Decision Support Systems

Abstract

Technical developments in electronic communication, computing, and decision support, coupled with new interest on the part of organizations to improve meeting effectiveness, are spurring research in the area of group decision support systems (GDSS). A GDSS combines communication, computing, and decision support technologies to facilitate formulation and solution of unstructured problems by a group of people. This paper presents a conceptual overview of GDSS based on an information-exchange perspective of decision making, Three levels of systems are described, representing varying degrees of intervention into the decision process. Research on GDSS is conceived as evolving over time from the study of simple "shell" systems, consisting of menus of features available for selection by a group, to consideration of sophisticated rule-based systems that enable a group to pursue highly structured and novel decision paths. A multi-dimensional taxonomy of systems is proposed as an organizing framework for research in the area. Three environmental contingencies are identified as critical to GDSS design: group size, member proximity, and the task confronting the group. Potential impacts of GDSS on group processes and outcomes are discussed, and important constructs in need of study are identified.group decision making, decision support

Validation of a Methodology for Confidence-Based Participatory Forest Management

“…In these models, each participant tries to maximize their personal gain, which leads to a reduction in the earnings of others. There are two fundamental procedures: Group Decision Support Systems (GDSS) [31] which aim to reach an overall negotiated decision among the participants through face-to-face meetings; and the Social Decisions Support Systems (SDS) [32], which visualize the flow of discussion through a network of statements, opinions, arguments, and comments, which helps to gain consensus before voting on an issue.…”

“…The largest number of applications are in this group: PLEXSYS from the University of Arizona [33]; Colab, designed for Xerox at the Palo Alto Research Center, [34]; Shell GDSS, developed at the University of Minnesota [31]; DECAID (Decision Aids for Groups), designed by [35]; LADN (Local Area Decision Network) [36]; and SMU Decision Room Project [37][38][39]. However, the most widely used is Loomio, which manages the decision-making in some emerging political parties in Europe [40].…”

A co‐creation platform for post‐occupancy decision support

“…Those improvements include powerful tools (i.e. data warehouses, OLAP, data mining and webbased DSS) (Kimball, 1996, E.F. Codd & Associates, 1993, E. Thomsen, 1997, and evolution of DSS from individual standalone applications to highly interconnected networks of collaborative support systems [see among the others (Alavi and Keen, 1989, DeSanctis and Gallupe, 1987, Kinney and Panko, 1996, Warkentin et al, 1997, McGrath and Hollingshead, 1994]. …”

Caramba—A Process-Aware Collaboration System Supporting Ad hoc and Collaborative Processes in Virtual Teams

“…For a recent extensive survey of collaborative application taxonomies see Bafoutsou and Mentzas [3]. DeSanctis and Gallupe [12], Ellis et al [17] and Johansen [24] suggest a two dimensional matrix based on time and place, where they differentiate between systems' usage at same place/same time (e.g. electronic meeting rooms), same place/different time (e.g.…”