2017
DOI: 10.1097/wco.0000000000000429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A forward-looking review of seizure prediction

Abstract: We conclude the review with an exercise in wishful thinking, which asks what the ideal seizure prediction dataset would look like and how these data should be manipulated to maximize benefits for patients. The motivation for structuring the review in this way is to create a forward-looking, optimistic critique of the existing methodologies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
197
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(201 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
197
0
Order By: Relevance
“…30 Recent progress and future directions in seizure detection and forecasting have been reviewed elsewhere in greater depth. [31][32][33] Aside from EEG recordings, however, machine learning techniques have also been applied to novel data sources for seizure detection. In neonatal epilepsy, Karayiannis et al examined extremity movements in bedside video recordings, training neural networks to classify recordings as focal clonic seizures, myoclonic seizures, or nonseizure movements; after training on 120 recordings, the authors achieved seizure detection sensitivities of 85.5%-94.4% and specificities of 92.5%-97.9% (varying with the type of input data, with overall better detection of myoclonic seizures) on a matched testing set.…”
Section: Automated Seizure Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 Recent progress and future directions in seizure detection and forecasting have been reviewed elsewhere in greater depth. [31][32][33] Aside from EEG recordings, however, machine learning techniques have also been applied to novel data sources for seizure detection. In neonatal epilepsy, Karayiannis et al examined extremity movements in bedside video recordings, training neural networks to classify recordings as focal clonic seizures, myoclonic seizures, or nonseizure movements; after training on 120 recordings, the authors achieved seizure detection sensitivities of 85.5%-94.4% and specificities of 92.5%-97.9% (varying with the type of input data, with overall better detection of myoclonic seizures) on a matched testing set.…”
Section: Automated Seizure Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we use the markers of critical slowing as a proxy to track the slow parameter k that, in turn, offers a biomarker for seizure susceptibility [3]. Moreover, we focus on seizure forecasting [3,27] rather than seizure prediction [2], as we do not attempt to predict the fast (noise) event that perturbs the system towards the seizure state.…”
Section: Conceptualization Of Critical Slowing In Epilepsymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanisms underlying the transition from a normal to a seizure state are currently an open question [2][3][4]. Unravelling the mechanisms underlying seizure generation could form the basis of much needed new treatment strategies, particularly for patients where existing treatments are ineffective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, in both the 1938 Griffiths and Fox study as well as in the recent Neurovista and Neuropace studies, the complexity of detecting time patterns is discussed (Griffiths and Fox, 1938; Freestone et al, 2017; Baud et al, in press). Across the whole group, there was a lot of variability, but within an individual, seizure time patterns could be very consistent.…”
Section: Seizures Have Multi-temporal Patterns On Ultradian Circadiamentioning
confidence: 99%