2012
DOI: 10.1080/1463922x.2012.725781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A formative approach to the strategies analysis phase of cognitive work analysis

Abstract: Strategies Analysis, the third phase of Cognitive Work Analysis, helps investigators consider the range of ways in which workers can perform control tasks. Most existing approaches to Strategies Analysis identify a limited number of domain-specific strategies. We present a two-phase formative Strategies Analysis method intended to expose the range of strategies possible within a work system and the likelihood that different types of strategies will be selected in different contexts. The first phase, the prepar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
(133 reference statements)
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Initial work in this area concentrated predominantly on the first two dimensions, namely work domain analysis (Naikar, 2013;Naikar et al, 2005) and activity analysis (Ashoori and Burns, 2010;Elix and Naikar, 2008;Lamoureux and Chalmers, 2009;Lamoureux and Sartori, 2007;Naikar et al, 2006). However, over time, increasingly greater attention has been paid to the other dimensions, specifically strategies analysis (e.g., Cornelissen et al, 2013;Hassall and Sanderson, 2014), social organisation and cooperation analysis (e.g., Naikar and Elix, 2015, 2016a, 2016bPfautz and Pfautz, 2009), and worker competencies analysis (e.g., Kilgore et al, 2009). This line of work on methods and modelling tools appears to have two main motivations.…”
Section: Methods and Modelling Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial work in this area concentrated predominantly on the first two dimensions, namely work domain analysis (Naikar, 2013;Naikar et al, 2005) and activity analysis (Ashoori and Burns, 2010;Elix and Naikar, 2008;Lamoureux and Chalmers, 2009;Lamoureux and Sartori, 2007;Naikar et al, 2006). However, over time, increasingly greater attention has been paid to the other dimensions, specifically strategies analysis (e.g., Cornelissen et al, 2013;Hassall and Sanderson, 2014), social organisation and cooperation analysis (e.g., Naikar and Elix, 2015, 2016a, 2016bPfautz and Pfautz, 2009), and worker competencies analysis (e.g., Kilgore et al, 2009). This line of work on methods and modelling tools appears to have two main motivations.…”
Section: Methods and Modelling Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…falls into the category of formative studies. Cornelissen et al (2012) and Hassall and Sanderson (2014) describe methods to search for alternative ways work can be done. Both start with an investigation into the existing domain, goals, constraints and strategies that make up work.…”
Section: Formative Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can accommodate both heuristic and rational processes (Horberry & Cooke 2013, Lintern, 2011, Naikar et al 2003). (Lintern, 2011;Hassall & Sanderson, 2014). If the decision maker is faced with a novel situation, their processes would be rational and would follow a sequential route around the decision ladder from left to right.…”
Section: Decision Laddersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A classic decision ladder template was chosen for the exercise (adapted from Hassall & Sanderson, 2014). The template consists of cognitive processes and states.…”
Section: Decision Laddermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation