2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10207-013-0219-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A formalization of card-based cryptographic protocols via abstract machine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We call a protocol is secure if it leaks no information for any run of the protocol (in other words, random variables I and V denoting the inputs and the visible sequence trace, respectively, are stochastically independent, where the visible sequence trace means what can be observed on the table). See [6][7][8] for the more formal definitions based on abstract machine and information theory.…”
Section: Correctness and Securitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We call a protocol is secure if it leaks no information for any run of the protocol (in other words, random variables I and V denoting the inputs and the visible sequence trace, respectively, are stochastically independent, where the visible sequence trace means what can be observed on the table). See [6][7][8] for the more formal definitions based on abstract machine and information theory.…”
Section: Correctness and Securitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feasibility of card-based cryptographic MPC is due to [dB89; CK93;NR98], with a formal model given by [MS14]. The only two papers looking at standard deck solutions are [NR99;M16].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the formal computation model of card-based protocols developed by Mizuki and Shizuya [8], a shuffle of the deck is mathematically defined by a pair (Π, F ), where Π is a set of permutations and F is a probability distribution on Π. We call the shuffle uniform if F is a uniform distribution, and closed if Π is a subgroup (of the symmetric group) [1].…”
Section: Properties Of Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%