2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.04.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A forest optimisation model including carbon flows: Application to a forest in Norway

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
30
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results showed that implementing management plans to favor carbon sequestration reduce the economic benefits from timber production, and vice-versa, indicating that these objectives are in conflict, which is consistent with previous studies (Backéus et al 2005, Raymer et al 2009, Nepal et al 2012. According to the model's results, with C prices of US$ 10 Mg -1 managing teak plantations for carbon sequestration only is not attractive, because of the high market value of teak timber.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our results showed that implementing management plans to favor carbon sequestration reduce the economic benefits from timber production, and vice-versa, indicating that these objectives are in conflict, which is consistent with previous studies (Backéus et al 2005, Raymer et al 2009, Nepal et al 2012. According to the model's results, with C prices of US$ 10 Mg -1 managing teak plantations for carbon sequestration only is not attractive, because of the high market value of teak timber.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…When maximization of NPVcarbon was set as the only management goal in the model, the generated harvest plans had lesser, later, and lower intensity thinnings, as well as longer rotations. Raymer et al (2009) found similar results analyzing several management strategies for increasing the benefits from carbon sequestration in a forestland in Norway. Likewise, Bateman & Lovett (2000) suggested to avoid thinnings for increasing carbon sequestration of plantations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because the rotation period is important for forest management decision making and strongly affected by regional forest resources, some studies have focused on estimating how the optimum rotation period is affected by different carbon offset systems. Carbon offsetting may be advantageous for forest management based on optimizing the rotation period (Raymer et al 2009), but it can be disadvantageous because of the effects of natural disturbance, which can release carbon (Galik and Jackson 2009). However, few studies have investigated the effects of existing carbon offsetting programs (including forest carbon sinks) in the context of global warming policy frameworks.…”
Section: Stand Age Yearmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their analysis, however, did not consider the use of wood as a substitute for energy-intensive materials and fossil energy. Taking substitution into account will typically change the optimum timber assortment composition and the rate at which carbon is passed through the forest ecosystem (Valsta 2007;Raymer et al 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%