1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2353(1996)9:4<258::aid-ca8>3.0.co;2-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A follow-up comparative study of two modes of learning human anatomy: By dissection and from prosections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
47
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Numbers followed by percentages in bracket. The results of this study contradict some previous studies of anatomy curriculum, which revealed high student satisfaction for curriculums using prosections, images and small group PBL modules, but not cadaver dissection (Nnodim et al, 1996;Dinsmore et al, 1999;McLachlan et al, 2004). Due to the heterogeneity of gross anatomical courses and comparison of students from different cultures, it is very difficult to evaluate which course design is better in learning gross anatomy.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…Numbers followed by percentages in bracket. The results of this study contradict some previous studies of anatomy curriculum, which revealed high student satisfaction for curriculums using prosections, images and small group PBL modules, but not cadaver dissection (Nnodim et al, 1996;Dinsmore et al, 1999;McLachlan et al, 2004). Due to the heterogeneity of gross anatomical courses and comparison of students from different cultures, it is very difficult to evaluate which course design is better in learning gross anatomy.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…This includes the use of prosections versus dissections of cadaveric materials [2,3], problem-based learning (PBL) [4,5], virtual-reality surgical simulators [6], computer-aided instruction [7] amongst others. Plastination was introduced by Professor Gunther von Hagens in 1977 [8] as a method of preservation of cadavers and biological OPEN    ACCESS specimens keeping it fulsome, lifelike and indefinitely antiseptic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of this restriction, the approach chosen uses prosected or previously‐dissected cadavers instead of student‐dissected cadavers. The prosection approach saves a significant amount of time (Nnodim, 1990, 1996; Drake et al, 2009) and evidence suggests that students learn anatomy using prosections as well as students doing their own dissections (Jones et al, 1978; Nnodim, 1990, 1996). After making this decision the next question focused on who would do the prosections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%