2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacl.2024.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A focused update to the 2019 NLA scientific statement on use of lipoprotein(a) in clinical practice

Marlys L. Koschinsky,
Archna Bajaj,
Michael B. Boffa
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, similar to several additional observational cohort studies [ 12 , 13 ], NHANES III utilized a mass-based (mg/dL) assay for quantifying Lp(a), which may be prone to measurement bias at the extremes of Lp(a) values [14] . While both mass (mg/dL) and particle (nmol/L) measurements are acceptable, particle-based measurement is preferred and efforts are ongoing to facilitate laboratory standardization [15] . Information on aspirin use was only collected at study baseline and also self-reported, subject to recall bias and misclassification [16] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, similar to several additional observational cohort studies [ 12 , 13 ], NHANES III utilized a mass-based (mg/dL) assay for quantifying Lp(a), which may be prone to measurement bias at the extremes of Lp(a) values [14] . While both mass (mg/dL) and particle (nmol/L) measurements are acceptable, particle-based measurement is preferred and efforts are ongoing to facilitate laboratory standardization [15] . Information on aspirin use was only collected at study baseline and also self-reported, subject to recall bias and misclassification [16] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new 2024 update to the 2019 NLA statement 12 for use of Lp(a) in clinical practice, for the first time in the US, recommends measuring Lp(a) in all. NLA recognizes individuals with Lp(a) levels ≥125 nmol/L (50 mg/dL) as high risk, which acknowledges that Lp(a) is associated with an increased incidence of ASCVD even in the absence of a family history of heart disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal is to identify individuals and family members who would benefit from more intensive disease prevention, including LDL-C lowering 11 . The most recent update to the National Lipid Association (NLA) statement recommends, for the first time in the US, to measure Lp(a) in all adults once in a lifetime 12 . The aims of our study are to assess how racial/ethnic and socioeconomic factors impact Lp(a) ordering practices in a large urban academic institution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also state that it is reasonable to check Lp(a) in those who have family history of premature ASCVD and to reclassify on the border of risk categories in order to determine treatment strategies [ 54 ]. Other societies such as the National Lipid Association and Canadian Cardiovascular Society take a more aggressive approach in screening, recommending that everyone should obtain an Lp(a) measurement as part of initial lipid screening [ 55 , 56 ]. Just as no major guidelines recommend screening for PAD in the setting of elevated Lp(a) levels, there are conversely no recommendations for screening Lp(a) in the setting of PAD.…”
Section: Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%