2013
DOI: 10.1089/scd.2012.0279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Focused Microarray for Screening Rat Embryonic Stem Cell Lines

Abstract: Here, we describe a focused microarray for screening rat embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and provide validation data that this array can distinguish undifferentiated rat ESCs from rat trophoblast stem (TS) cells, rat extraembryonic endoderm cells, mouse embryonic fibroblast feeder cells, and differentiated rat ESCs. Using this tool, genuine rat ESC lines, which have been expanded in a conventional rat ESC medium containing two inhibitors (2i), for example, glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) and mitogen-activated pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(61 reference statements)
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relevance of elevated, somewhat varied expression of several genes encoding transcription factors that may direct trophoblast formation (38-40) (e.g., GATA3, TFAP2A, TFAP2C, CDX2, EOMES) is unclear but might reflect the fact that such cells are hovering on the point of differentiating along that lineage (i.e., transcriptionally primed) as soon as the pluripotent gene networks are down-regulated. Although the observation that CDX2 was coexpressed with POU5F1 in the undifferentiated H1 BP cells might be considered surprising, CDX2 expression has been consistently observed in rat ESCs (41)(42)(43) and associated with POU5F1 expression in human (44) and bovine (45) embryonic trophectoderm. More unexpected was the coexpression of CDX2 with NANOG, because the two transcription factors have mutually antagonistic effects in mouse ESCs and preimplantation embryos (46).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relevance of elevated, somewhat varied expression of several genes encoding transcription factors that may direct trophoblast formation (38-40) (e.g., GATA3, TFAP2A, TFAP2C, CDX2, EOMES) is unclear but might reflect the fact that such cells are hovering on the point of differentiating along that lineage (i.e., transcriptionally primed) as soon as the pluripotent gene networks are down-regulated. Although the observation that CDX2 was coexpressed with POU5F1 in the undifferentiated H1 BP cells might be considered surprising, CDX2 expression has been consistently observed in rat ESCs (41)(42)(43) and associated with POU5F1 expression in human (44) and bovine (45) embryonic trophectoderm. More unexpected was the coexpression of CDX2 with NANOG, because the two transcription factors have mutually antagonistic effects in mouse ESCs and preimplantation embryos (46).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in rESCs, the 2i culture condition induces a surprisingly high amount of Cdx2, a trophectoderm/TSC-specific marker (4,9). Because TSCs contribute to the placental development rather than the embryo proper, a strong expression of Cdx2 could further inhibit the developmental potency of rESCs.…”
Section: Pkci-maintained Rescs Express a Reduced Amount Of Trophoblasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both 2i and 2i/LIF culture conditions also efficiently maintain pluripotency in mESCs (8). However, unlike mESCs, rESCs that are established and maintained in 2i and 2i/LIF express relatively high levels of trophoblast stem cell (TSC)-specific factors, like CDX2 (4,9), and have a propensity for genomic instability (2). Curiously, rESCs grown with Rhoassociated kinase and TGF-␤ inhibitors also showed much higher levels of CDX2 expression (9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was described that use of a GSK3 inhibitor, CHIR99021, in cultivation of rat and mouse ESCs caused ectopic expression of Cdx2 [33][34][35] encoding a wellknown trophoectodermal transcription factor [36]. According to RT-PCR and transcriptome analysis, Cdx2 was not expressed in the rEF lines and was highly expressed (on the average, 1,192 normalized read counts) in the rat pluripotent cells (Fig.…”
Section: Transcriptome Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%