2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2014.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A focus fusion framework with anisotropic depth map smoothing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moeller et al (2015) have implemented a variational framework using total variation regularization. In a similar work related to depth processing, Boshtayeva et al (2015) have enforced depth map smoothing to recover all-in-focus image. Minhas et al (2009) simply applied median filtering to remove noise from the depth map.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moeller et al (2015) have implemented a variational framework using total variation regularization. In a similar work related to depth processing, Boshtayeva et al (2015) have enforced depth map smoothing to recover all-in-focus image. Minhas et al (2009) simply applied median filtering to remove noise from the depth map.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the modified-Laplacian FM (Nayar & Nakagawa, 1994) performs poorly in noisy conditions, whereas gray-level variance measure is more robust against noise (Pertuz et al, 2013). Thus, it seems suitable to apply different FM operators to compute the focus quality in the SFF so that if the performance of one operator degrades, another operator can supplement it (Boshtayeva et al, 2015). However, as it is not known in advance which operator is the most suitable for an underlying image sequence, it is hard to find out the most suitable operator for a particular image sequence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aggregation of focus measures is efficient to compute but it may not provide accurate depth map. On the other hand, several optimization and machine learning-based approaches have been proposed for better 3D shapes [10,[14][15][16][17]. Ahmad and Choi [14] proposed the usage of dynamic programming to obtain optimal focus measure.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It improves accuracy and obtains consistent depth maps, but it needs additional computations in local learning process. Recently, in [15], authors suggested anisotropic diffusion process with regularization to obtain better depth map. The above-mentioned approaches provide better depth maps as compared to the focus measure aggregation however, these are also computationally expensive.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plane index of maxima of intensity response for each pixel position along z-axis is selected as the decision map from which to create the final composite image. In the literature, several methods have been studied for specific applications and imaging modalities [17,11,5,3]. Most of these fails when presented with very diverse specimen morphologies as they have been over-optimized for specific applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%