2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2020.110396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fluorometric metal-organic framework oxygen sensor: from sensitive powder to portable optical fiber device

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Depending on the MOF structure, this loss in sensitivity can be moderate (ca. threefold reduction in sensitivity in MAF-2, MAF-4, and a Eu-NDC MOF) [ 105 , 111 , 113 ] or almost complete as observed in some PCN-224 type MOFs [ 97 ]. The magnitude of this effect appears to depend on the size of the apertures connecting the pores of the framework.…”
Section: Mofsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Depending on the MOF structure, this loss in sensitivity can be moderate (ca. threefold reduction in sensitivity in MAF-2, MAF-4, and a Eu-NDC MOF) [ 105 , 111 , 113 ] or almost complete as observed in some PCN-224 type MOFs [ 97 ]. The magnitude of this effect appears to depend on the size of the apertures connecting the pores of the framework.…”
Section: Mofsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Free-standing MOF crystals cannot be applied easily and serve only as a model system, and MOF immobilization in polymers might be challenging since sensitivity may reduce significantly [ 97 ]. Fortunately, it is possible to grow crystals of such MOFs on different porous supports [ 97 ] whereas other MOFs with smaller pores appear not to show drastic sensitivity decrease upon immobilization [ 111 ]. Handling of sensors based on electrospun fibers also may be challenging for many applications like imaging of oxygen distribution on surfaces.…”
Section: Comparison Of Different Porous and Non-porous Matricesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reversibility is an indication of the response time and reproducibility of the ratiometric oxygen sensor. The response time includes the quenching time t Q and recovery time t R [29,30], which represent the time required for a 95% change in the luminescence signal; t Q considers the change from an anaerobic to aerobic atmosphere, and t R considers the change from an aerobic to anaerobic environment [31]. Figure 7 shows the variation of the OP value, and the response time of the film under the alternating conversion of the deoxygenation (DO = 0 mg/L) and oxygenation environment (DO = 6 mg/L).…”
Section: Reversibility Of the Ratiometric Oxygen-sensing Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, oxygen is consumed during the electrochemical process, which hinders the application of electrochemical methods in continuous oxygen measurement in a closed environment. Among all the methods, optical oxygen sensors based on the fluorescence quenching effect, which is induced by the collision between triplet oxygen and luminescent indicators, does not consume oxygen nor transmit electrical signals due to the particularity of the photophysical process during detection and exhibits a higher sensitivity (0.013–263), a wider dynamic range (0–100%, oxygen concentration) [ 6 ], a faster response [ 8 ], and immunity to external magnetic interference [ 9 , 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%