2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.01.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Fluidics Comparison of Alcon Infiniti, Bausch & Lomb Stellaris, and Advanced Medical Optics Signature Phacoemulsification Machines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8,10 However, comparing machines is limited by manufacturer-specific measurements and substantial variability between machines, even at the same settings. 11 In addition, physical properties may not correlate with clinical outcomes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8,10 However, comparing machines is limited by manufacturer-specific measurements and substantial variability between machines, even at the same settings. 11 In addition, physical properties may not correlate with clinical outcomes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 Whether the increased risk for endothelial damage is related to fluidic principles or simply to the fact that volume infused is a surrogate measure of needle time is unclear. 14 Fluidic properties of these devices have been compared in laboratory studies 11,19 ; however, the results are conflicting. The main comparative measure used was the rate of postocclusion surge, which occurs when the vacuum seal is broken.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These experiments are often difficult to reproduce because of difficulties with setup, specimen change through repeated testing, variable incision leakage, and variability between specimens. 5,6 A primary goal of the safety and performance experiments this laboratory has performed over the years is to test phacoemulsifiers under tightly controlled laboratory conditions that can be reproduced by anyone with the appropriate test equipment. [7][8][9][10] Observations performed in vivo in human or animal eyes, while perhaps more clinically relevant, are often nearly impossible to reproduce.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible explanation is that unoccluded flow vacuum in peristaltic systems is greater than some might assume. 14,18,21,22 This would decrease the anticipated difference between the 2 systems in vacuum produced at the phacoemulsification tip, even without occlusion. It is difficult to explain why peristaltic vacuum might be worse.…”
Section: Capsule Rupture Most Commonly Occurs During Thementioning
confidence: 95%