2020
DOI: 10.1115/1.4046409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Fluid–Structure Interaction Study on a Bionic Fish Fin With Non-Uniform Stiffness Distribution

Abstract: In this paper, the propulsive performance of a caudal peduncle-fin swimmer mimicking a bio-inspired robotic fish model is numerically studied using a fully coupled FSI solver. The model consists of a rigid peduncle and a flexible fin which pitches in a uniform flow. The flexible fin is modeled as a thin plate assigned with non-uniformly distributed stiffness. A finite volume method based in-house Navier–Stokes solver is used to solve the fluid equations, while the fin deformation is resolved using a finite ele… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cui and Jiang [17] established a model of a robotic fish driven by a single joint and connected to several passive joints, and proved that swimming performance could be optimized by varying the stiffness. In the study by Xie et al [18], the performance of a caudal fin with medium stiffness was the best, and a similar conclusion was reached in [19]. In [20], the stiffness of the robotic fish was adjusted by varying the air pressure on the fish body so that the natural frequency could range from 2.0 to 2.8 Hz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cui and Jiang [17] established a model of a robotic fish driven by a single joint and connected to several passive joints, and proved that swimming performance could be optimized by varying the stiffness. In the study by Xie et al [18], the performance of a caudal fin with medium stiffness was the best, and a similar conclusion was reached in [19]. In [20], the stiffness of the robotic fish was adjusted by varying the air pressure on the fish body so that the natural frequency could range from 2.0 to 2.8 Hz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The difficulty lies in the analysis of the hydrodynamic forces. Numerical methods, such as the Navier-Stokes equations [19,25] and the discrete vortex panel method [12], are used to analyze unsteady flow fields. These methods are accurate, but make the dynamic model of the robotic fish too complicated to solve.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Refinement is set towards the fin boundary to ensure correct calculation and capture of all physical effects, as pictured in Figure 5b. Mesh independency study can be found in [10]. The time step for each case is /100.…”
Section: Domain and Case Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%