2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2013.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fluid dynamic gauging device for measuring fouling deposit thickness in opaque liquids at elevated temperature and pressure

Abstract: We report proof-of-concept results for a fluid dynamic gauging (FDG) device for measuring the thickness and strength of soft solid fouling layers immersed in an opaque liquid in situ and in real time at elevated pressures and temperatures. The device reported here is configured to make measurements on the inner rod of an annular flow test section but the concept is generic. Data are presented from tests using mineral oil at temperatures and pressures up to 140 °C and 10 bara, respectively. Problems with the pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(26 reference statements)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…C d in the suction mode is lower than that in ejection, which is attributed to differences in eddy formation beneath the nozzle and inside the nozzle. This has been discussed by Chew et al 7 and Ali et al 5 The profiles obtained for the washing-up liquid in Figure 5c show a weak difference between ejection and suction modes at higher h o /d t (and small C d values), but this is in the region beyond that used for FDG measurements.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…C d in the suction mode is lower than that in ejection, which is attributed to differences in eddy formation beneath the nozzle and inside the nozzle. This has been discussed by Chew et al 7 and Ali et al 5 The profiles obtained for the washing-up liquid in Figure 5c show a weak difference between ejection and suction modes at higher h o /d t (and small C d values), but this is in the region beyond that used for FDG measurements.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…C d in the suction mode is lower than that in ejection, which is attributed to differences in eddy formation beneath the nozzle and inside the nozzle. This has been discussed by Chew et al and Ali et al…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The FDG technique can measure (in a destructive mode) local strength properties throughout the different layers of deposits (Chew et al 2004a). The ability of the FDG to be operated at elevated temperature and pressure (Ali et al 2013) has gained some interest for use in membrane filtration scenarios, where permeation is involved (Chew et al 2007, Jones et al 2010, Lewis et al 2016. However, these studies 5 were mainly performed using synthetic organics to simulate constant TMP filtration in food industries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%