2015
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.26017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A flexible nested sodium and proton coil array with wideband matching for knee cartilage MRI at 3T

Abstract: Purpose We describe a 6×2 channel sodium/proton array for knee MRI at 3 Tesla. Multi-element coil arrays are desirable because of well-known signal-to-noise ratio advantages over volume and single-element coils. However, low coil-tissue coupling that is characteristic of coils operating at low frequency can make the potential gains from a phased array difficult to realize. Methods The issue of low coil-tissue coupling in the developed six channel sodium receive array was addressed by implementing 1) a mechan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(62 reference statements)
2
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum efficiency in Fig. 3b is comparable with those reported for various coils and phantoms at 3 T, as well as 7 T in Refs 14,[35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42] In the next example, we further analyze the magnetic field B 1 uniformity of the system in Fig. 2.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The maximum efficiency in Fig. 3b is comparable with those reported for various coils and phantoms at 3 T, as well as 7 T in Refs 14,[35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42] In the next example, we further analyze the magnetic field B 1 uniformity of the system in Fig. 2.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…By avoiding coil exchange between measurements, patient comfort is increased, and the total measurement time is reduced. Various 23 Na coil designs have been presented for head, breast, and knee applications. Solutions for synchronous acquisition of 23 Na and 1 H signal have been developed .…”
Section: Current State and Technical Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research community has further advanced flexible coil technology by demonstrating a variety of techniques. Nordmeyer‐Massner et al replaced conventional semirigid circuit board substrate with woven copper conductors mounted on stretchable fabric to image the knee over a range of flexion angles; Corea et al helped open the door for wearable coils by printing conductive ink onto thin, flexible plastic film; X. Yan et al proposed an imbalanced capacitor distribution such that magnetic and electric coupling cancel each other to form a self‐decoupled loop, which can provide robust SNR that is independent of coil spacing within an array; and some others have demonstrated a range of novel electromechanical structures and materials . Whereas these developments generally focused on substrate flexibility and/or reducing coupling, we saw an opportunity to create a new coil structure that provides encircling coverage of cylindrical objects over a range of diameters without coverage overlap or gaps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nordmeyer-Massner et al replaced conventional semirigid circuit board substrate with woven copper conductors mounted on stretchable fabric to image the knee over a range of flexion angles 10,11 ; Corea et al helped open the door for wearable coils by printing conductive ink onto thin, flexible plastic film 12 ; X. Yan et al proposed an imbalanced capacitor distribution such that magnetic and electric coupling cancel each other to form a self-decoupled loop, which can provide robust SNR that is independent of coil spacing within an array 13,14 ; and some others have demonstrated a range of novel electromechanical structures and materials. [15][16][17][18] Whereas these developments generally focused on substrate flexibility and/or reducing coupling, we saw an opportunity to create a new coil structure that provides encircling coverage of cylindrical objects over a range of diameters without coverage overlap or gaps. The main challenges in building such an adjustable array are to design a flexible substrate that minimizes the distance between the coil and object while simultaneously minimizing shifts in tuning and matching that arise from positioning changes, which can reduce SNR, attributed to nonoptimal noise matching 19 and coil coupling, which injects preamplifier noise into the multiple-channel receive coil.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%