Abstract:When novice modelers first attempt to build a Bayesian network, they are often impressed with the intuitive graphical structures that capture their causal understanding. This favorable impression evaporates on proceeding to parameterization. Conditional probability tables (CPT) require parameters for often hundreds of very similar scenarios and specifying them in the absence of data can be overwhelming. The problem is even more severe when eliciting parameters from experts with limited time. Often, there is lo… Show more
“…Mascaro and Woodberry (2022) introduce a flexible method for parameterizing incomplete CPTs using interpolation techniques called InterBeta . The authors build on previously proposed frameworks of parameterizing a local structure to alleviate the burden of parameterizing large CPTs.…”
Section: What To Expect From This Special Issuementioning
“…Mascaro and Woodberry (2022) introduce a flexible method for parameterizing incomplete CPTs using interpolation techniques called InterBeta . The authors build on previously proposed frameworks of parameterizing a local structure to alleviate the burden of parameterizing large CPTs.…”
Section: What To Expect From This Special Issuementioning
“…In addition, while we focus here on cases in which the user supplies two CPT rows (the best and worst case), it is also possible to extend the approach to multirow interpolations. (See Mascaro and Woodberry (2020) for further discussion. )…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this research, we used and tested the Bayesian intelligence interpolation method and its variants for CPTs called “InterBeta” (Mascaro and Woodberry, 2020). We compare the outputs of InterBeta using two case studies where full CPTs were elicited from groups of experts using the IDEA protocol.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As described inMascaro and Woodberry (2020), specifying row weights only allows direct dependencies between the inputs and the interpolation score node, not directly to the final Beta distribution node.…”
Structured expert judgment (SEJ) is a method for obtaining estimates of uncertain quantities from groups of experts in a structured way designed to minimize the pervasive cognitive frailties of unstructured approaches. When the number of quantities required is large, the burden on the groups of experts is heavy, and resource constraints may mean that eliciting all the quantities of interest is impossible. Partial elicitations can be complemented with imputation methods for the remaining, unelicited quantities. In the case where the quantities of interest are conditional probability distributions, the natural relationship between the quantities can be exploited to impute missing probabilities. Here we test the Bayesian intelligence interpolation method and its variations for Bayesian network conditional probability tables, called “InterBeta.” We compare the various outputs of InterBeta on two cases where conditional probability tables were elicited from groups of experts. We show that interpolated values are in good agreement with experts' values and give guidance on how InterBeta could be used to good effect to reduce expert burden in SEJ exercises.
In addition, I would also like to thank my parents, friends, and the department faculty and staff for their help and support throughout my time at Iowa State. I want to also offer my appreciation to the subject matter experts at Iowa HSEMD who were willing to participate in the conditional probability assessments and provide feedback and support throughout this research.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.