2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-98446-9_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Flexible Evolutionary Algorithm for Task Allocation in Multi-robot Team

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper expands the operational domain of an existing EA-based task allocation framework from the literature. The existing EA provides efficient allocations against single-robot and loosely coupled MR task distributions (Arif, 2019; Arif and Haider, 2017, 2018). The proposed EA, named RoSTAM, handles tightly coupled MRCF (ST–MR–TA) while keeping its structure consistent with the existing EA.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This paper expands the operational domain of an existing EA-based task allocation framework from the literature. The existing EA provides efficient allocations against single-robot and loosely coupled MR task distributions (Arif, 2019; Arif and Haider, 2017, 2018). The proposed EA, named RoSTAM, handles tightly coupled MRCF (ST–MR–TA) while keeping its structure consistent with the existing EA.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RoSTAM is perceived as a flexible task allocation framework capable of handling a variety of MRTA problem representations. A similar EA-based framework has already demonstrated efficient allocation of SR and loosely coupled MR tasks (Arif, 2019; Arif and Haider, 2018). The performance was evaluated against an exact integer program, an auction-based scheme (Arif, 2019) and a genetic algorithm (GA) (Arif and Haider, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The multiple mobile robots' dynamic task allocation problem is generalized as multiple travelling salesman problem (Arif and Haider, 2017) and classified as a combinatorial optimization problem (dos Reis and Bastos, 2017). It is solved by evolutionary optimization algorithms: genetic algorithm (Arif and Haider, 2017;Arif and Haider, 2018;Bänziger et al, 2018), particle swarm optimization (PSO) (Alshawi and Shalan, 2017), ant colony optimization (ACO) (Li et al, 2017b), the variants of PSO and ACO algorithms (Muhuri and Rauniyar, 2017).…”
Section: Optimization-based Task Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few researchers considered integer programming (Li and Li, 2017;Su et al, 2018;Zhou et al, 2019) and various search algorithms (Zhao et al, 2015;Kartal et al, 2016;Mitiche et al, 2019). Many researchers used metaheuristic algorithms (Liu and Kroll, 2012;Alshawi and Shalan, 2017;Li et al, 2017b, Z. Zhu et al, 2017Arif and Haider, 2018;Chen et al, 2018b, Padmanabhan Panchu et al, 2018Wang et al, 2018;Zhou et al, 2019) to solve this optimization problem, and this could be because of the ease of implementation of such algorithms.…”
Section: Optimization-based Task Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%