2022
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.959582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A flexible data-driven audiological patient stratification method for deriving auditory profiles

Abstract: For characterizing the complexity of hearing deficits, it is important to consider di erent aspects of auditory functioning in addition to the audiogram. For this purpose, extensive test batteries have been developed aiming to cover all relevant aspects as defined by experts or model assumptions. However, as the assessment time of physicians is limited, such test batteries are often not used in clinical practice. Instead, fewer measures are used, which vary across clinics. This study aimed at proposing a flexi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From a clinical perspective, it would be interesting to compare the performance in conditions like the ones tested here with basic psychoacoustic performance measures, measures of cognitive function, aspects such as hearing-aid satisfaction in aided real-life listening conditions, or more generally to include such conditions in auditory profiling (see, e.g., Sanchez-Lopez et al, 2020 ; Iliadou et al, 2022 ; Saak et al, 2022 ). It is possible that a systematic manipulation of spatio-temporal integration demands in laboratory settings can help to magnify interindividual performance differences and hence to identify listeners with specific difficulties in their everyday life, thus supporting the diagnostics and fitting processes of hearing devices.…”
Section: General Discussion and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a clinical perspective, it would be interesting to compare the performance in conditions like the ones tested here with basic psychoacoustic performance measures, measures of cognitive function, aspects such as hearing-aid satisfaction in aided real-life listening conditions, or more generally to include such conditions in auditory profiling (see, e.g., Sanchez-Lopez et al, 2020 ; Iliadou et al, 2022 ; Saak et al, 2022 ). It is possible that a systematic manipulation of spatio-temporal integration demands in laboratory settings can help to magnify interindividual performance differences and hence to identify listeners with specific difficulties in their everyday life, thus supporting the diagnostics and fitting processes of hearing devices.…”
Section: General Discussion and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The task of the CLS requires participants to select the descriptors from an 11-point scale, e.g., ‘too loud’, ‘medium’, ‘soft’, etc., based on their loudness perception. The CLS is a supra- threshold listening test that has been included in the ‘auditory profile’ (i.e., a comprehensive and well-specified set of audiological test procedures described in Van Esch et al, 2013) and has also recently been proposed for usage in machine-learning-supported auditory profiles by Saak et al (2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14][15][16] One emerging approach to this problem has been to harness unsupervised machine learning methods to understand audiogram heterogeneity in a small number of studies. [16][17][18][19][20] Unsupervised machine learning methods identify high sample densities in datasets without imposing any prior knowledge or classi cation systems. This approach is particularly valuable given recent challenges to the traditional understanding of audiogrampathology associations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%