2001
DOI: 10.1090/s1056-3911-01-00300-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A flexible affine đť‘€-sextic which is algebraically unrealizable

Abstract: We prove that the union of a real algebraic curve of degree six and a real line on RP 2 cannot be isotopic to the arrangement in Figure 1. Previously, the second author realized this arrangement with flexible curves. Here we show that these flexible curves are pseudo-holomorphic in a suitable tame almost complex structure on CP 2 .For the proof of the algebraic non-realizability we consider all possible positions of the curve with respect to certain pencils of lines. Using the Murasugi-Tristram inequality for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The only exception is the arrangement denoted in [9] by D4. Its unrealizability was derived in [9] from the algebraic unrealizability of affine sextics of the isotopy type B 2 (1, 4, 5), proved in [4]. This argument cannot work in the pseudoholomorphic case for the simple reason that such an affine pseudoholomorphic sextic was constructed in [13] (see also [4]).…”
Section: Types and Series General Outline Of Proofs Of Theorems 1 Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The only exception is the arrangement denoted in [9] by D4. Its unrealizability was derived in [9] from the algebraic unrealizability of affine sextics of the isotopy type B 2 (1, 4, 5), proved in [4]. This argument cannot work in the pseudoholomorphic case for the simple reason that such an affine pseudoholomorphic sextic was constructed in [13] (see also [4]).…”
Section: Types and Series General Outline Of Proofs Of Theorems 1 Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its unrealizability was derived in [9] from the algebraic unrealizability of affine sextics of the isotopy type B 2 (1, 4, 5), proved in [4]. This argument cannot work in the pseudoholomorphic case for the simple reason that such an affine pseudoholomorphic sextic was constructed in [13] (see also [4]). All proofs in [9] become valid in the pseudoholomorphic case if the following line is added to Table 2 in the paper [9]:…”
Section: Types and Series General Outline Of Proofs Of Theorems 1 Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations