2022
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/2265/2/022050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A flexible actuator curve model for aeroelastic simulations of wind turbines in atmospheric boundary layers

Abstract: The current trend of wind turbine upscaling has led to the use of long and slender blades prone to large structural deformations. In the present study, the impact of the aeroelastic effects is assessed for the NREL-5MW wind turbine in a turbulent wind. To this end, an actuator curve method coupled to a one-dimensional finite-element structural solver is implemented in a fourth-order finite difference code that can perform large eddy simulation (LES) of realistic winds. The approach is computationally affordabl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the standard deviation of the airloads along the blade in Figure 8 starts to unveil the differences in the data set. Although we were not able to provide a fair comparison for the same conditions as in the case of the time‐averaged airloads, we proved the validity of our data by checking them against the distributions of the standard deviation along the blade for similar cases in Ehrich et al 85 and in Trigeaux et al, 65 obtaining satisfactory results. The cases using the UA model exhibit a relevant increase in the airloads variability in the first half of the blade, whereas the cases with two‐way FSI coupling exhibit a slight reduction towards the tip, as shown in our previous works.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the standard deviation of the airloads along the blade in Figure 8 starts to unveil the differences in the data set. Although we were not able to provide a fair comparison for the same conditions as in the case of the time‐averaged airloads, we proved the validity of our data by checking them against the distributions of the standard deviation along the blade for similar cases in Ehrich et al 85 and in Trigeaux et al, 65 obtaining satisfactory results. The cases using the UA model exhibit a relevant increase in the airloads variability in the first half of the blade, whereas the cases with two‐way FSI coupling exhibit a slight reduction towards the tip, as shown in our previous works.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Similar to other works, 64,65 the simplified coupling procedure profits from the sectional 1D formulation of the ALM and avoids the complex fluid-solid interface treatment with the associated kinematic and traction conditions. 66 Moreover, the efficient coupling algorithm and structural solver are able to preserve the overall computational efficiency, already loaded with the considerable expense of the LES.…”
Section: Fsi Modelmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This leads to a better estimation of the aerodynamic loads, hence much decreasing the need for a tip correction, especially when slender blades are considered. A more detailed description of the used regularization is provided in Trigaux et al [25] and its advantages over a 3D distribution are detailed in Caprace et al.…”
Section: Actuator Line Methods (Alm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The VPM code does not capture the aeroelastic effects of the wind turbine blades, those thus act as rigid bodies. Although the fourth‐order finite differences code has been extended and two‐way coupled to an aeroelastic code, 52 this feature is currently only available for the AL method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and two-way coupled to an aeroelastic code, 52 this feature is currently only available for the AL method.…”
Section: Estimation Of the Fatigue Loadsmentioning
confidence: 99%