1945
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9904-1945-08367-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fixed-point theorem

Abstract: Introduction. The purpose of this note is to sharpen a recent result of G. E. Schweigert [4].1 It will be shown that the condition of semi local-connectedness may be dropped. However, if this is strengthened to local-connectedness, then the conclusion asserts the existence of a fixed point. Further, though perhaps of less interest, it is shown that separability is not necessary.In a second section we give a somewhat more abstract version which is valid for certain partially ordered topological spaces. So far a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

1954
1954
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…of a result of Wallace [3] and Theorem 2 is equivalent to a result of Wang [5]. Then K and L are t-invariant continua and X = K^JL.…”
Section: Theorem 1 Below Is a Restatementmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…of a result of Wallace [3] and Theorem 2 is equivalent to a result of Wang [5]. Then K and L are t-invariant continua and X = K^JL.…”
Section: Theorem 1 Below Is a Restatementmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Hausdorff space and T is a topological group which leaves an end point e of X fixed. In [3], Wallace proved that if T is cyclic and X is a locally connected continuum, T has a fixed point other than e. Then in [4], Wallace asked the following question: If X is a peano continuum and T is compact or abelian, then does T have a fixed point other than e?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12]. Il indique également que le résultat est signalé, sous une forme différente, par G. Birkhoff dans la deuxième édition de [4] (1948).…”
Section: R(x)/xex};unclassified
“…This means that Kx C H; order Kx in a standard fashion as follows: e is the first element of Kx (assuming e e K~x); if p, y eKx, p =£ e, y =£ e, then p ^ y iff p = y or p separates e from y in X. ^ is a total order on Kx-By virtue of [8], Kx has a largest element w; w is a cut point of X, and w is evidently fixed under K. Further, every point of Cw separates e from Cz. We note that Cw is compact and proceed as above to show that Cw contains a fixed point of C. But this means that w is fixed under C. Certainly w =fc e, so that C and K have a fixed point, other than e, in common.…”
Section: If X Is Irreducibly T-invariant Then X Contains No Cut Pointmentioning
confidence: 99%