2002
DOI: 10.4310/cis.2002.v2.n4.a1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fixed-lag smoothing solution to out-of-sequence information fusion problems

Abstract: Abstract. Multi-sensor tracking using delayed, out-of-sequence Information (OOSI) is a problem of growing importance due to an increased reliance on networked sensors interconnected via complex communication network architectures. In such systems, it is often the case that information (in the form of raw or processed measurements) is received out-of-time-order at the fusion center. Owing to compatibility with legacy sensors and limited communication bandwidth most practical fusion systems send track informatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This section compares IFAsyn with other OOS algorithms for solving (1) whose optimality holds when the delays are bigger than one time lag (f t , a > t + 1) [5]- [11]. We skip [12], optimal for any delay too, because it restarts the fusion process from the time stamp of the incoming £ s t We also consider [13]-A1, although its degree of suboptimality is a few percent of MSE and is less general because (Fk,i, Qk,i, k < I) has to be available for arbitrary k and I.…”
Section: B Ifasyn Versus Other Algorithms For the Oospmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This section compares IFAsyn with other OOS algorithms for solving (1) whose optimality holds when the delays are bigger than one time lag (f t , a > t + 1) [5]- [11]. We skip [12], optimal for any delay too, because it restarts the fusion process from the time stamp of the incoming £ s t We also consider [13]-A1, although its degree of suboptimality is a few percent of MSE and is less general because (Fk,i, Qk,i, k < I) has to be available for arbitrary k and I.…”
Section: B Ifasyn Versus Other Algorithms For the Oospmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This lets the fusion center obtain the same estimates as if it had received the data without delays, increasing its memory and computational needs. To reduce these needs, several OOS estimators have been recently developed, such as [1] and [5]- [13] for the KF, and [14]- [16] for Particle Filters (PF).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This enables the information fusion to incorporate measurements corresponding to past states in an optimal, elegant way but is computationally enormous expensive [27] (optimal multilag filtering algorithm for linear systems). To overcome the computationally expensive augmented state algorithm, Challa and Wang introduce the iterated augmented state algorithm [28]. In [29], they additionally describe the use of these algorithms in scenarios with clutter.…”
Section: Out-of-sequence Measurement Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, to overcome the resulting problems of existing fixed-lag Kalman smoother with the infinite memory structure (IMS) in [1][2][3][4][5], the fixed-lag smoother with the finite memory structure (FMS) has been developed for state estimation in discrete time-invariant systems [6][7][8][9] and discrete time-varying systems [10]. This FMS smoother has been known to have some good properties such as unbiasedness and deadbeat, which cannot be obtained by the IMS smoother.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%