2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2010.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A five-minute DNA extraction method for expedited detection of Phytophthora ramorum following prescreening using Phytophthora spp. lateral flow devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, these laboratory methods could be used in conjunction with on-site tests such as Phytophthora spp. LFD (Lane et al 2007;Tomlinson et al 2010) to maximise the overall efficiency and accuracy of testing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, these laboratory methods could be used in conjunction with on-site tests such as Phytophthora spp. LFD (Lane et al 2007;Tomlinson et al 2010) to maximise the overall efficiency and accuracy of testing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extraction of DNA from plant material DNA was extracted from aseptically excised samples of plant material using a KingFisher ML instrument (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) as described by Tomlinson et al (2010). Briefly, plant material (typically 200-500 mg) was homogenized in 5 ml of Buffer C1 from the NucleoSpin Plant kit, incubated at 65°C for 30 min and centrifuged for 2 min at 6000 x g. To extract DNA from the clarified lysates, 1 ml Qiagen PB Binding Buffer (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and 75 μl Magnesil paramagnetic particles (PMPs) (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) were added and the samples were processed using a KingFisher ML to wash the PMPs three times in 70% ethanol followed by elution of the DNA in 200 μl molecular grade water.…”
Section: Taqman Primer and Probe Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagnosis is problematic because some Phytophthoras are hard to culture (Hayden et al 2004), taxonomic expertise is lacking and molecular techniques need to be validated. For P. ramorum, there has been much progress in developing molecular tools for rapid and accurate detection (e.g., Kong et al 2004;Bilodeau et al 2009;Tomlinson et al 2010;Vettraino et al 2010). However, given that it cannot be assumed that the latest techniques are adopted immediately by all plant phytosanitary control agents, there is still a question of how reliable realworld plant passporting schemes for this and similar pathogens are (EFSA PLH 2011; Tsopelas et al 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a sample does not test positive by any Phytophthora species, it is likely also not to test positive (and therefore not to be infected) by P. ramorum. In this case, the predictive value of the P. ramorum-specific test will depend not only on the prevalence of P. ramorum, but also on the presence of other Phytophthora species (Tomlinson et al, 2010). Tomlinson et al (2010) argue that Phytophthora species other than P. ramorum are likely to be common for samples coming from plant nurseries, and to be rare for samples coming from confirmed P. ramorum outbreak sites.…”
Section: Additional Information Options To Reduce Likelihood Of Intromentioning
confidence: 99%