2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-22493-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Five-microRNA Signature for Survival Prognosis in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma based on TCGA Data

Abstract: Novel biomarkers for pancreatic adenocarcinoma are urgently needed because of its poor prognosis. Here, by using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) RNA-seq data, we evaluated the prognostic values of the differentially expressed miRNAs and constructed a five-miRNA signature that could effectively predict patient overall survival (OS). The Kaplan-Meier overall survival curves of two groups based on the five miRNAs were notably different, showing overall survival in 10.2% and 47.8% at five years for patients in high… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the miRNA 200s family has been shown to suppressor tumor progression via EMT inhibition [50]. More recently, a number of multigene prognostic signatures have been proposed, of 2 [51], 5 [52] or 11 microRNAs [53].…”
Section: Microrna and Long Non-coding Rnamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the miRNA 200s family has been shown to suppressor tumor progression via EMT inhibition [50]. More recently, a number of multigene prognostic signatures have been proposed, of 2 [51], 5 [52] or 11 microRNAs [53].…”
Section: Microrna and Long Non-coding Rnamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until now, 11 studies on the identification of gene signatures in PDAC have been published (Birnbaum, et al, 2017;Chen, et al, 2015;Haider, et al, 2014;Kirby, et al, 2016;Ma, et al, 2011;Newhook, et al, 2014;Raman, et al, 2018;Shi, et al, 2017;Shi, et al, 2018;Stratford, et al, 2010;Wang, et al, 2013). By using multivariate Cox methods, we retrospectively analyzed the predictive capacity of each of them on the present 11 datasets and found that these gene signatures were less robust than the path:00982_1 signature ( Supplementary Table S3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…PDAC has a complex molecular landscape (Raphael BJ, 2017). Efforts in identifying PDAC datasets have led to the discovery of potential gene signatures, which contain various numbers of distinguishable genes (Birnbaum, et al, 2017;Chen, et al, 2015;Haider, et al, 2014;Kirby, et al, 2016;Ma, et al, 2011;Newhook, et al, 2014;Raman, et al, 2018;Shi, et al, 2017;Shi, et al, 2018;Stratford, et al, 2010;Wang, et al, 2013). However, these reported signatures have few overlapping component genes with different functions, raising questions about their biological relevance, clinical significance and universal application for the management of PDAC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until now, 11 studies on the identification of gene signatures in PDAC have been published [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. By using multivariate Cox methods, we retrospectively analyzed the predictive capacity of these signatures in the present 11 datasets, in comparison with the path:00982_1 signature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PDAC has a very complex molecular landscape [5]. Efforts in deeply analyzing datasets have led to the discovery of potential PDAC gene signatures, which contain various numbers of distinguishable genes [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. However, these reported signatures have few overlapping component genes with different functions, raising questions about their biological relevance, clinical significance and universal application for the management of PDAC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%