2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41592-019-0573-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A five-level classification system for proteoform identifications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
77
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

7
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1d ). Inspired by early adoption of class levels for phosphopeptide localizations 23 and more recently for proteoforms 24 , we developed this classification system to more accurately describe the quality and confidence of glycopeptide and glycosite identifications. Level 1 glycopeptide identifications indicate that all glycans identified in the total glycan mass modification are localized to specific serine and threonine residues with a localization probability > 0.75.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1d ). Inspired by early adoption of class levels for phosphopeptide localizations 23 and more recently for proteoforms 24 , we developed this classification system to more accurately describe the quality and confidence of glycopeptide and glycosite identifications. Level 1 glycopeptide identifications indicate that all glycans identified in the total glycan mass modification are localized to specific serine and threonine residues with a localization probability > 0.75.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These technological advances have been supported by the corresponding TD/MD-specific developments in data analysis tools, such as deconvolution of highly convoluted product ion distributions and product ion annotation approaches. [43][44][45][46][47] As a result, TD MS/proteomics has emerged as a powerful tool in basic, translational, and clinical research, not only for protein identification, but also for large-scale proteoform elucidation.…”
Section: (Introduction)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the following sections we will use the five-level classification system for proteoform identifications proposed by Smith et al [50]. We will refer to levels 1, 2A, 2B and 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%