2003
DOI: 10.1107/s010827010301669x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A five-coordinate ruthenium(II)–porphyrin–carbene complex: [bis(3-trifluoromethylphenyl)methylene-κC](5,10,15,20-tetra-p-tolylporphyrinato-κ4N)ruthenium(II)

Abstract: The stable title trifluoromethyl-substituted carbenyl metalloporphyrin, [Ru(C(15)H(8)F(6))(C(48)H(36)N(4))], has a five-coordinate Ru atom which is displaced from the porphyrin N(4) plane towards the axial carbene ligand by 0.230 (3) A. The Ru--C(carbene) bond coincides with a crystallographic twofold axis and its length of 1.841 (6) A is notably shorter than the value of 1.868 (3) A in the pyridine adduct.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
0
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar situation has been previously observed with other porphyrin ruthenium complexes . The Ru−N distances of 2.042(3)−2.054(3) Å all fall within the range previously reported for diamagnetic ruthenium porphyrin complexes. ,, The geometry of the coordination sphere is close to an octahedral geometry. Bond angles at ruthenium are in the range 90.02(14)−96.39(14)° for cis angles and 173.08(12)−173.58 (12)° for trans angles.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar situation has been previously observed with other porphyrin ruthenium complexes . The Ru−N distances of 2.042(3)−2.054(3) Å all fall within the range previously reported for diamagnetic ruthenium porphyrin complexes. ,, The geometry of the coordination sphere is close to an octahedral geometry. Bond angles at ruthenium are in the range 90.02(14)−96.39(14)° for cis angles and 173.08(12)−173.58 (12)° for trans angles.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The Ru−C distance of 1.839(4) Å is slightly longer than the ruthenium−carbon double bond (1.829(9) Å) for (TPP)Ru[C(CO 2 Et][MeOH] reported by us some years ago and similar to those reported by Che and Miyamoto. , The Ru−O (THF) distance 2.376(3) Å is shorter than the axial Os−O bond (THF, 2.43(2) Å) in a similar carbene osmium complex, reported by Woo et al, as expected from the different size of the two metal atoms.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…This has led to the formation of an organometallic complex, [Ru(η 3 -C 4 ,N 3 ,S-L 1 )(η 2 -P,P-dppm)(η 1 -P-dppm)] ( 1 ) (Figure ). The Ru1−C3 bond length of 2.076(3) Å is comparable with the literature reports . The angles around the Ru II center reveal severely distorted octahedral geometry {N1−Ru−S1, 79.21(8)°; trans angles P1−Ru−P3, P4−Ru−N, and S−Ru−C3 of 174.36(3)°, 161.92(9)°, and 156.92(11)°, respectively}.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%