2016
DOI: 10.1039/c5sc03124a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A five-coordinate Mn(iv) intermediate in biological water oxidation: spectroscopic signature and a pivot mechanism for water binding

Abstract: The identification of a unique intermediate in biological water oxidation establishes the water binding mechanism in the S2 to S3 state transition.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

33
311
2
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(348 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
33
311
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the weaker H-bonding makes ammonia binding at the W2 site difficult to reconcile with the highly anisotropic nuclear quadrupole parameter of the bound ammonia 13 . We note that our data do not exclude ammonia moving from the W1 to W2 site or detaching from Mn during the S 2 →S 3 transition 27,28 .…”
contrasting
confidence: 68%
“…On the other hand, the weaker H-bonding makes ammonia binding at the W2 site difficult to reconcile with the highly anisotropic nuclear quadrupole parameter of the bound ammonia 13 . We note that our data do not exclude ammonia moving from the W1 to W2 site or detaching from Mn during the S 2 →S 3 transition 27,28 .…”
contrasting
confidence: 68%
“…Although we do not see any evidence for the presence of more than one S 2 structure in the 1F data under our conditions, we cannot exclude the presence of minor concentrations (< 20%) and further studies will be required to elucidate if such forms exist as transient states between the S 2 and S 3 states as proposed by some theoretical studies, in relation to the water‐insertion pathway (Pantazis et al , Bovi et al , Siegbahn , Isobe et al , , Narzi et al , Shoji et al , Retegan et al , Ugur et al ). We have taken the first step into this direction, by collecting X‐ray diffraction data for two time points during the S 2 ‐S 3 transition (150 μs and 400 μs after the second flash; Kern et al ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…EPR (Cox et al , , Lubitz et al ) and theoretical studies (Bovi et al , Siegbahn , Narzi et al , Isobe et al , Shoji et al , Retegan et al , Ugur et al ) proposed that there is an insertion of a water molecule in the Mn 4 CaO 5 cluster during the S 2 to S 3 transition. As the quality of the room temperature crystallography data of the S 3 state has been improved compared to previous studies (Young et al , Suga et al ), the exact position of the inserted water molecule is becoming clear, although its protonation state is still uncertain (Kern et al ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was supported further by the very slow reaction of S 3 with reductants like hydrazine or hydroxylamine as compared to that with S 2 state (Messinger et al 1991;Messinger and Renger 1990). At present, it appears that this structural change is relatively minor with regard to Mn-Mn and Mn-Ca distances, but may involve the binding of one water molecule to the Mn 4 CaO 5 cluster (Noguchi 2008;Suzuki et al 2008;Siegbahn 2009)-possibly in a complex sequence of events (Cox and Messinger 2013;Siegbahn 2013;Retegan et al 2016;Capone et al 2016;Ugur et al 2016). We note though that substrate water exchange experiments exclude the water molecule binding to the Mn 4 CaO 5 cluster, during this transition, to act as a Fig.…”
Section: Gernot's Legacymentioning
confidence: 96%